SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re Oakland caller identifying Cooper sketch
Document date 22 February 1980
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-43:290-290
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-43:290-290 Document: Airtel SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re Oakland caller identifying Cooper sketch Id: Cooper-Part-43:290-290 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-43%3A290-290 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 43 p. 290 (DB Cooper-17516), Airtel, dated 22 Feb 1980, serial SE 164-81-8364 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-43%3A290-290
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78) FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ Airtel ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 2/22/80
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, SAN FRANCISCO (164-220) (P) (ORA)
RE: NORJACK OO: Seattle
---
On 2/13/80, [REDACTED] telephone number [REDACTED] telephonically contacted the Oakland Resident Agency. [REDACTED] advised that he had in today's San Francisco Chronicle observed an artist sketch of D. B. Cooper. He said that after observing the sketch it very closely resembles [REDACTED] [REDACTED], who [REDACTED] last knew was a [REDACTED] in the U. S. Marine Corps at Camp Pendleton. He said that his last contact with him was in 1962 and that he was in the [REDACTED] in the Marine Corps. He said that he was affectionately referred to as [REDACTED] [REDACTED] He said that men in his unit referred to him as [REDACTED] and that this name was adopted by him as a nick- name. [REDACTED] stated he did not have any idea where he was currently located. When asked if [REDACTED] may have been jump qualified, [REDACTED] stated that he did not know.
San Francisco indices reviewed regarding [REDACTED] with no record being found. San Francisco is conducting no additional investigation with regard to this matter unless directed to do so by Seattle.
---
164-81-8364 SEARCHED ✓ INDEXED ✓ SERIALIZED /1/ FILED /1/ FEB 27 1980
---
② - Seattle 1 - San Francisco JBM/sdc (3)
---
Approved: _______________ Transmitted ______________ Per ____DB-Cooper-17516 (Number) (Time)
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-8364, SF 164-220
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.