SAC Baltimore to SAC Seattle re Fort Pearce letter (file copy)

Title revised to match the document’s own text.

Original title: Airtel SAC Baltimore to SAC Seattle re Fort Pierce letter (file copy)

Document date 6 March 1980

Part 43page 3951 pageDB Cooper-17633

Open in FBI Vault (Part 43, page 395 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-43:395-395

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-43:395-395

Document: Airtel SAC Baltimore to SAC Seattle re Fort Pearce letter (file copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-43:395-395
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-43%3A395-395

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 43 p. 395 (DB Cooper-17633), Airtel, dated 6 Mar 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-43%3A395-395

x AIRTEL

---

3/6/80

---

[redacted] [illegible handwritten initials] SAR/R - [illegible]

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE

FROM: SAC, BALTIMORE (164-223) (SQ.8) (P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK, CAA - HIJACKING (OO: Seattle)

---

Enclosed for the Seattle Office is a letter from [redacted] Fort Pearce, Florida. The letter was addressed to FBI, Washington, D. C., but was incorrectly delivered to the Wilmington, Delaware Resident Agency.

The letter, dated 2/14/80, concerns the subject and money involved in your investigation, NORJAK. The enclosed is forwarded for your information and action deemed appropriate.

Wilmington is also currently pursuing another lead on this matter which emanated from a totally unrelated source. Seattle is requested to check, if feasible, the name[redacted] against those in its file and inform Wilmington of any positive results.

---

[illegible handwritten initials/stamp]

---

2 - Seattle (Enc.1) 2 - Baltimore KFS:bjc (4)

---

DB Cooper-17633

Serials: BA 164-223

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.