SAC Atlanta to SAC Seattle re Rome, Georgia composites (file copy)

Document date 13 March 1980

Part 43page 4071 pageDB Cooper-17651

Also filed at: Part 43 p. 406 · Part 43 p. 408 · Part 69 p. 180 · Part 76 p. 125

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 43, page 407 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-43:407-407

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-43:407-407

Document: Memo SAC Atlanta to SAC Seattle re Rome, Georgia composites (file copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-43:407-407
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-43%3A407-407

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 43 p. 407 (DB Cooper-17651), Memo, dated 13 Mar 1980, serial SE 164-81-8368 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-43%3A407-407

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) DATE: 3/13/80

FROM : [redacted]SAC, ATLANTA (164-642) (P) (SQ 2)

SUBJECT: [redacted] SUBS: 4141, J CCA OO: SEATTLE

---

Re Atlanta airtel to Seattle dated 7/23/79; and Seattle airtel to Atlanta 1/22/80.

On 2/1/80, Deputy U.S. Marshal [redacted] U.S. Marshal's Service, Rome, Georgia, was provided with composite photographs of subject. [redacted] advised that he had not actually seen the individual whom he believed might be identical with subject, but [redacted] had met this individual. His only reason for suspecting this individual was that [redacted] knew his last name to be [redacted] and he lived on a large estate immediately [redacted] [redacted] and [redacted] did not believe him to have any visible means of support. He therefore believed that [redacted] money must be illegal, and that was the reason he thought that individual may be identical to subject. He had no substantial information that he was identical to subject, however.

After recontacting Deputy [redacted] numerous times, on 2/27/80, he advised that he had not had a chance to show the photographs to [redacted] and that he himself had still not seen [redacted] The photographs were returned by Deputy [redacted] at that time.

---

ADMINISTRATIVE

In view of the fact that there is no reason to suspect the individual referred to by [redacted] of being identical with subject, other than the fact that he has the name [redacted] no further investigation being conducted regarding this particular individual in the Atlanta Division.

---

(3) - Seattle 2 - Atlanta RCL/cer (4)

---

164-81-8368

---

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Pla[n]

DB Cooper-17651

Serials: AT 164-642, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-8368