Los Angeles re South Dakota man claiming to be Cooper (file copy, first page)
Document date 13 June 1980
Also filed at: Part 69 p. 130 · Part 71 p. 11
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Part of: Los Angeles to Director, Minneapolis and Seattle re South Dakota man claiming to be Cooper
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-44:259-259
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-44:259-259 Document: Teletype Los Angeles re South Dakota man claiming to be Cooper (file copy, first page) Id: Cooper-Part-44:259-259 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-44%3A259-259 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 44 p. 259 (DB Cooper-18123), Teletype, dated 13 Jun 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-44%3A259-259
LA0014 1632335Z RR HQ MP SE DE L4 R 132335Z JUN 80
---
FM LOS ANGELES (164-497) (7) (P) TO DIRECTOR (164-2111) ROUTINE MINNEAPOLIS (164-73) ROUTINE SEATTLE (164-81) ROUTINE BT UNCLAS NORJAK
---
ON [REDACTED] FORMER [REDACTED] FURNISHED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION RE CAPTIONED INVESTIGATION TO SA [REDACTED] LOS ANGELES DIVISION, DURING A TELEPHONE CALL FROM SOURCE'S PRESENT RESIDENCE IN [REDACTED].
SOURCE ADVISED THAT ABOUT ONE YEAR AGO [REDACTED] [REDACTED] DATE OF BIRTH [REDACTED] AN AMERICAN INDIAN NOW LIVING IN SOUTH DAKOTA CONFIDED HE WAS PLANNING TO EVENTUALLY PUBLISH A BOOK REGARDING HIS PAST ACTIVITIES AND ADVENTURES AND [REDACTED] AN EXCERPT FROM WHAT WAS PURPORTED TO BE A [REDACTED] OF THE BOOK. THIS EXCERPT WAS AN ACCOUNT OF [REDACTED] HIJACKING OF A COMMERCIAL AIRLI[NER] IN THE EARLY 1970S USING THE NAME "COOPER". ACCORDING TO [guess: SOURCE],
---
[guess: Aug] 1, [illegible] b6 b7C b7D
---
DB Cooper-18123
Serials: 164-2111, LA 164-497, MP 164-73, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.