To SAC Seattle re NORJAK (A) suspect, Santa Fe recontact (file copy)
This copy: Part 44 p. 263Also filed at Part 44 p. 262 (primary)
This copy’s own title
To SAC Seattle re NORJAK (A) suspect, Santa Fe recontact (file copy)
Document date 6 June 1980
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 44 p. 262.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Part of: To SAC Seattle re Santa Fe recontact and Sacramento lead on NORJAK suspect
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-44:263-263
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-44:263-263 Document: Airtel to SAC Seattle re NORJAK (A) suspect, Santa Fe recontact (file copy) Id: Cooper-Part-44:263-263 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-44%3A263-263 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 44 p. 263 (DB Cooper-18132), Airtel, dated 6 Jun 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-44%3A263-263
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS
Date 6/6/80 ---------------------------------------------------------------
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: [redacted] SAC, [redacted] RUC
SUBJECT: NORJAK (A) OO: SEATTLE BUFILE: 164-2111
---
Re Sacramento teletype to Minneapolis, dated 3/17/80; San Francisco teletype to Seattle, dated 4/3/80; and Albuquerque airtel to Seattle, dated 4/9/80.
On 5/20/80, [redacted] Santa Fe, New Mexico, was recontacted regarding [redacted] whereabouts. [redacted] stated that she did receive a telephone call from him about three weeks ago, but he would not identify his current location and only stated that he was in the Chicago, Illinois, area, or possibly headed there. She knew of no place to contact him, and she did advise him that the FBI wished to talk to him about captioned matter. She said his reaction on the phone was one in which he did not appear startled, but made a comment that he has already served his time with the [redacted] She again reiterated that she thought he no longer thinks rationally due to his alcoholic condition.
---
[redacted] was shown artist conceptions of Unsub, and she claimed that [redacted] did not resemble this individual. She stated that he has a [redacted] [redacted] possibly [redacted] which he obtained as [redacted] According to her, [redacted] She furnished a photograph for observation of [redacted] known as [redacted] who she said strongly resembles [redacted] although [redacted] is about 37 years of age at this time. She said the photograph was taken in about 1973 of [redacted] and it was noted that the photo- graph does not bear a resemblance to artist conceptions of Unsub. She said she has no recent photographs of [redacted] With regard to [redacted] she noted that she thinks he lives somewhere [illegible]
---
(2)-Seattle 1-Salt Lake City (164-259) (Info) 1-Minneapolis (164-73) (Info) 1-San Francisco (164-220) [guess: Squad 16] (Info) 2-Sacramento (164-50) 1-Albuquerque Approved: ______ Transmitted [redacted] (Time) (8) ☆ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING [illegible] DB Cooper-18132 [illegible] Per JUN 1 0 1980
Serials: 164-2111, MP 164-73, SC 164-50, SE 164-81, SF 164-220, SU 164-259