Recommendation for Promotion of Officer (DA AGO Form 78) - 2d Lt John E. List

Document date 23 July 1951

Part 45page 291 pageDB Cooper-4652

Open in FBI Vault (Part 45, page 29 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-45:029-029

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-45:029-029

Document: Recommendation for Promotion of Officer (DA AGO Form 78) - 2d Lt John E. List
Id: Cooper-Part-45:029-029
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-45%3A029-029

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 45 p. 29 (DB Cooper-4652), Form, dated 23 Jul 1951 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-45%3A029-029

RECOMMENDATION FOR PROMOTION OF OFFICER (See AR 605-12) DATE: 23 July 1951

BASIC DATA ON THIS FORM TO BE OBTAINED FROM WD AGO FORM 66

FROM: TO: Commanding General San Francisco Port of Embarkation Fort Mason, California

LAST NAME - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE INITIAL: LIST, JOHN E. ARMY SERIAL NUMBER: 0 978 253 ARM OR SERVICE: TC BASIC COMPONENT: ORC AGE YEARS MONTHS: [blank]

THE ABOVE NAMED OFFICER IS WITHIN THE ZONE OF CONSIDERATION FOR PROMOTION PURSUANT TO DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ANNOUNCEMENT.

DATES OF RANK IN GRADE: 2ND LT: 24Nov50 1ST LT: [blank] CAPTAIN: [blank] MAJOR: [blank] LT COLONEL: [blank]

DATE OF E.A.D. CURRENT TOUR: 24Nov50 GRADE FROM: 2ndLt GRADE TO: 1stLt

PRESENT DUTY AND ASSIGNMENT: Student, Army Finance School (Fiscal Division)

UNIT OR STATION: 9206 TSU TC,SFPE, California

INCLUSIVE DATES FROM: 10Apr51 INCLUSIVE DATES TO: 18 July 51

CATEGORY AND EXPIRATION DATE (when applicable): IV 31Aug52

Assistant Fiscal Officer, Fiscal Division, SFPE 19 July 51 to present b6 per NPRC b7C

Commanders will confine recommendations to brief statements. These statements should be phrased to bring out the fact that the recommending officer either does or does not consider the officer fully qualified for promotion, that he would be fully agreeable to keep the officer in his command if promoted to the higher grade, and that there is no disciplinary action pending on the officer.

THE ABOVE NAMED OFFICER [CX] IS [ ] IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PROMOTION IN THE ARMY OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

He is an outstanding young officer who has demonstrated to have leadership and executive ability. He is constantly striving to improve himself; accomplishes his work with efficiency, applies himself energetically and cheerfully to his duties and is considered to be fully qualified for promotion.

If promoted it is desired that the officer be retained in his present duty assignment to Fiscal Division, SFPE.

There is no disciplinary action pending on the officer.

CAUTION: SPECIAL HANDLING REQUIRED This material copied from records of National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Missouri. Do not recopy to be used for reference only. Do not [guess: remove] original form outside or disseminate in its original form outside the Bureau.

TYPED NAME, GRADE AND ORGANIZATION OF RECOMMENDING OFFICER: JOHN D. BIRD, MAJOR TC, 9206 TSU-TC Chief, Fiscal Division, SFPE.

SIGNATURE OF RECOMMENDING OFFICER: [signature area]

For RA Officers prefix dates by T - temporary, P - permanent. REVERSE SIDE FOR INDORSEMENTS

DA AGO FORM 78 1 SEP 48 REPLACES WD AGO FORM 78, 3 AUG 44, WHICH IS OBSOLETE. DB Cooper 4652

Serials: DB Cooper 4652