SAC Portland to SAC Seattle enclosing four photographs re Eugene witness
Document date 12 March 1981
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-46:078-078
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-46:078-078 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle enclosing four photographs re Eugene witness Id: Cooper-Part-46:078-078 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-46%3A078-078 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 46 p. 78 (DB Cooper-18849), Airtel, dated 12 Mar 1981 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-46%3A078-078
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☑ Airtel ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 3/12/81
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81)
FROM: [redacted] SAC, PORTLAND (164A-41) (RUC)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: Seattle)
Re Seattle airtel to Portland, 2/11/81.
Enclosed for Seattle is one packet of four photographs.
Referenced airtel set out leads for enclosed photographs to be shown to [redacted] Eugene, Oregon.
Portland notes that the photograph of suspect, [redacted] [redacted] was not accompanied by appropriate throw-down photo- graphs which would be required in the event that [redacted] makes a positive identification. In view of the fact that the photograph of [redacted] has been altered by the special projects unit so as to depict [redacted] with the same hair as shown in the artist's conception of D.B. COOPER, Portland would have no way of independently coming up with additional photographs which are similar in appearance so that the photograph of [redacted] is not unique.
Prior to the display of any witnesses in this matter, an appropriate photo spread should be developed to meet any legal challenge to any identifications which might result.
Portland has placed this case in an RUC status.
---
2 - Seattle (Enc. 1) [redacted] 2 - WFO (164A-301) 1 - Portland
BME:ntf (5)
[handwritten signatures/initials]
SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____
MAR 1 6 1981
Approved: _________ Transmitted ________ (Number) (Time) ☆ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING
DB Cooper-18849
Serials: 164-301, PD 164-41, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.