SAC Sacramento to SAC Los Angeles re NORJACK suspect reported by Lone Pine source
This copy: Part 46 pp. 118–119Also filed at Part 62 pp. 236–237 (primary)
This copy’s own title
SAC Sacramento to SAC Los Angeles re NORJACK suspect, Lone Pine, California
Document date 3 September 1981
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 62 pp. 236–237.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-46:118-119
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-46:118-119 Document: Airtel SAC Sacramento to SAC Los Angeles re NORJACK suspect, Lone Pine, California Id: Cooper-Part-46:118-119 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-46%3A118-119 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 46 pp. 118–119 (DB Cooper-18897–18898), Airtel, dated 3 Sep 1981 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-46%3A118-119
XX AIRTEL
---
9/3/81
TO: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497) (C-1)
FROM: SAC, SACRAMENTO (164-50) (RUC)
SUBJECT: NORJACK OO: Seattle
Re Los Angeles airtel to Sacramento dated 4/28/81.
On 5/26/81, [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] Lone Pine, California, telephone number [REDACTED] [REDACTED] reiterated the information he had earlier provided U.S. Deputy Marshal [REDACTED] Los Angeles, during a conver- sation he had with [REDACTED] several months before. [REDACTED] stated he believes that [REDACTED] could be identical to D.B. Cooper due to a newspaper article he observed which detailed [guess: captioned] incident. [REDACTED] stated that, to his knowledge, [REDACTED] has not been observed since approximately 1969, and he feels reasonably certain that [REDACTED] is responsible for the hijacking based upon the newspaper article.
Although he does not know [REDACTED] whereabouts, he noted that [REDACTED] was formerly employed by Ford Motor Corporation Rialto-San Bernardino, California area.
He also advised that [REDACTED] has been in the Inyo County Jail, Independence, California and the Veterans Administration Office, Independence, has a reference to him.
[REDACTED] requested [REDACTED] not be contacted regarding [REDACTED] this time. On 9/27/81, records at the Bishop, California Police Department and Inyo County Sheriff's Office, Independence, failed to disclose any information identifiable with [REDACTED]
---
2 - Los Angeles (2)- Seattle (164-81) 1 - Sacramento JCW/kml (5)
---
[STAMP] SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED __AN__ FILED __[illegible]__
SEP 8 1981
---
DB Cooper-18897
---
10H - 8 8579
SC 164-50
---
On 8/27/81, it was determined that [REDACTED] is a U.S. Marine Corps veteran and is assigned Veterans Administration (VA) number [REDACTED] He is receiving dis- ability payments through the VA, apparently on a regular basis although his current whereabouts were not available.
---
LEADS
LOS ANGELES
AT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: Will attempt to determine current information regarding [REDACTED] through the Veterans Administration Office, UAC by Seattle.
---
SEATTLE
AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON: Based upon the status of current investigation, will consider feasibility of further investigation to develop [REDACTED] as suspect in captioned matter, including arrest checks in San Bernardino, California and the FBI Identification Division.
---
- 2* -
---
DB Cooper-18898
Serials: LA 164-497, SC 164-50, SE 164-81