Insert re San Francisco investigation of former employee possibly using missing man's identity
Document date 26 June 1981
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-46:145-147
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-46:145-147 Document: Insert re San Francisco investigation of former employee possibly using missing man's identity Id: Cooper-Part-46:145-147 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-46%3A145-147 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 46 pp. 145–147 (DB Cooper-18938–18940), Report, dated 26 Jun 1981, serial SE 164-81-8586B (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-46%3A145-147
[REDACTED] RLS/jan 1
---
The following investigation was conducted by SA [REDACTED]
AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.
On June 26, 1981, [REDACTED] (protect), the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] San Francisco, California, telephone number [REDACTED] [REDACTED], was contacted, in his office, regarding a listed former employee by the name of [REDACTED]
It is noted that a [REDACTED] has been reported as a missing person by his parents and has not been seen or heard from, by his parents nor his wife, since his honorable discharge from the U.S. Military Service in [REDACTED] Their attempts to locate him to determine whether he is dead or alive have been unsuccessful to date. Numerous private in- vestigators have been retained with no results, and their cor- respondence with various governmental agencies most recently determined that a [REDACTED] with the same spelling was listed as having been employed by the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] San Francisco, California, during the year of 1979.
A letter from [REDACTED] father to Senator Allan Cranston of San Francisco expressed a plea for assist- ance in locating their long missing son. They explained in their letter that they feared that someone may have taken their son's name and identity and that possibly their son [REDACTED] had met with foul play after his discharge from the Military.
[REDACTED] was apprised of this situation and was shown a photograph of the real [REDACTED] for comparison with the photograph contained in their file listed under the name [REDACTED] [REDACTED] confirmed that these photographs were made of one and the same persons and that they were identical individuals.
[REDACTED] reviewed [REDACTED] file out loud and furnished the following information:
---
164-81-8586B
---
DB Cooper-18938
---
b6 b7C b7D
[REDACTED] RLS/jan
2
---
He stated that on [REDACTED] [REDACTED] became a client of the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] in San Francisco on [REDACTED] [REDACTED] When he applied at the center he also became a resident at their mens dormitory.
On his application he listed his occupation as a [REDACTED] stated he was also a very good [REDACTED] He advised that [REDACTED] while at the center, appeared to be a very private person and didn't want to discuss his private affairs either during his stay nor did he speak of his private life prior to coming to the center.
[REDACTED] was a very good worker and while a client he never caused the center's employees any problems and [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
On [REDACTED] became an employee of the center working at various jobs using his skills and trades listed above. During this time, [REDACTED] on a couple of occasions, had broken the rules and showed up at the cen- ter [REDACTED]
On [REDACTED] was listed as [REDACTED] He was scheduled to work on that day at a farm project, however, he never showed up for the job. Also he was listed to return to the center on [REDACTED] [REDACTED] again he never showed and has never been seen by the center employees as of that date.
The employees file indicates that in case of emer- gency, [REDACTED] listed a person to contact as [REDACTED] [REDACTED] residing at [REDACTED] North St. Petersburg, Florida.
When [REDACTED] first reported as a client, he listed his Social Security Number as [REDACTED] and when he started as an employee it was listed as [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] stated that during [REDACTED] made a statement that his formative life with his family was intolerable and that since his childhood he had always wanted to runaway from his family environment.
---
DB Cooper-18939
---
b6 b7C b7D
[REDACTED] RLS/jan
3
---
[REDACTED] explained that [REDACTED] while at the center and his [REDACTED] [REDACTED] while he worked on the farm, and he recalls [REDACTED] had very bad dental problems. His behavior was very good while in the status of a client, but when he became an em- ployee it seemed that he could [REDACTED] [REDACTED] while drawing wages.
---
SA [REDACTED] requested to review their file photographs of the [REDACTED] so that it could be compared with a photograph furnished by the parents of [REDACTED] Upon viewing their photographs, it was determined that these two individuals were one and the same and identical with the exception of the ten year lapse in age.
---
[REDACTED] also advised that when [REDACTED] first [REDACTED] at the center he made the statement that prior to coming to California and staying at the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] in San Francisco he had stayed at the [REDACTED] in Miami, Florida.
---
[REDACTED] advised that since [REDACTED] depar- ture from the [REDACTED] his whereabouts is presently unknown by this organization.
---
DB Cooper-18940
Serials: SE 164-81-8586B