SAC Portland to SAC Seattle forwarding letter received 10/4/82, NORJACK

Document date 25 October 1982

Part 47page 281 pageDB Cooper-19300

Open in FBI Vault (Part 47, page 28 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-47:028-028

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-47:028-028

Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle forwarding letter received 10/4/82, NORJACK
Id: Cooper-Part-47:028-028
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-47%3A028-028

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 47 p. 28 (DB Cooper-19300), Airtel, dated 25 Oct 1982, serial SE 164-81-8699 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-47%3A028-028

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ Airtel ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS

Date 10/25/82

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81) FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164A-41) (RUC)

SUBJECT: NORJACK CAA-HIJACKING OO: Seattle

Re Portland letter to Seattle 5/28/82.

Enclosed for Seattle is original letter of [REDACTED] received by Portland, 10/4/82, regarding captioned matter. Evaluation and any actioned deemed appropriate is being left to Office of Origin.

---

2 - Seattle (Enc. 1) [illegible] 10/29/82 1 - Portland PLM (3)

NO [illegible]

164A-81-8699 [illegible] M-

---

b6 b7C

DB Cooper-19300

---

Approved: _______________ Transmitted _______________ (Number) (Time)

Serials: PD 164-41, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-8699

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.