SAC Omaha to SAC Seattle re Spencer, Iowa suspect information

This copy: Part 47 p. 113Also filed at Part 47 p. 112 (primary)

This copy’s own title

SAC Omaha to SAC Seattle re Spencer, Iowa suspect (duplicate copy)

Document date 6 April 1983

Part 47page 1131 pageDB Cooper-19412

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 47 p. 112.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 47, page 113 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-47:113-113

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-47:113-113

Document: Airtel SAC Omaha to SAC Seattle re Spencer, Iowa suspect (duplicate copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-47:113-113
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-47%3A113-113

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 47 p. 113 (DB Cooper-19412), Airtel, dated 6 Apr 1983, serial SE 164-81-8726 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-47%3A113-113

FD-36 (Rev. 8-26-82)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 4/6/83

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, OMAHA (164A-325) (RUC)

SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE

---

Re Bureau airtel to Seattle and Omaha 2/3/83 and telcall to SA [REDACTED] from Sioux City, Iowa, RA.

Enclosed for Seattle is the original and one copy of an investigative insert and two composite pictures supplied to Sioux City by SA [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] Spencer, Iowa, advised that his suspicion of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was based on his memory of [REDACTED] features and belief that [REDACTED] has not worked for many years. It should be noted that [REDACTED] last saw [REDACTED] over twenty years ago. It should also be noted that [REDACTED] has been trying to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised he has retained attorneys in Washington State who will file civil suit against [REDACTED] when they can [REDACTED] from him. [REDACTED] did not believe the composite picture supplied by Seattle greatly resembled [REDACTED]

Investigation in Omaha at Spencer, Iowa, completed.

---

(2) - Seattle (Encls. - 4) 1 - Omaha RDG:klc (3)

---

Approved: ________ Transmitted ________ (Number) (Time)

[stamp] 164 A - 81 - 8726 [stamp] SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED [illegible] APR 11 1983 FBI-SEATTLE [initials]

---

DB Cooper-19412

Serials: 164-325, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-8726