SAC Detroit to SAC Seattle re NORJACK caller (duplicate copy)
Document date 13 June 1983
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-47:119-119
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-47:119-119 Document: Airtel SAC Detroit to SAC Seattle re NORJACK caller (duplicate copy) Id: Cooper-Part-47:119-119 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-47%3A119-119 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 47 p. 119 (DB Cooper-19418), Airtel, dated 13 Jun 1983 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-47%3A119-119
AIRTEL 6/13/83
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, DETROIT (164A-115) (RUC) (SQD. C-4)
NORJACK CAA - HIGHJACKING OO: SEATTLE
---
Enclosed for Seattle is the original and one copy of an investigative insert.
For the information of Seattle, on 3/15/83, [REDACTED] (PROTECT IDENTITY) called FBI Detroit to advise that she knew a male, [REDACTED] who worked at the "House of Bedrooms" in Pontiac, Michigan. [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] had told her that [REDACTED] name D.B.COOPER. [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] said he [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] which he said [REDACTED] then told [REDACTED] that he [REDACTED] and he [REDACTED] said he [REDACTED] [REDACTED] then [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] indicated that [REDACTED] most of the time.
---
Since there are no leads to Detroit and logical investigation has been conducted, this matter is being considered RUC.
UNSUB ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
(2)- Seattle (Enc. 2) 1 - Detroit LAP/dlb (3)
---
[guess: 164A-115] - 8729 S.L. [illegible]
---
DB Cooper-19418
---
b6 b7C b7D
Serials: DE 164-115, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.