SAC Newark to SAC Baltimore re NORJAK lead being Philadelphia territory

This copy: Part 47 p. 190Also filed at Part 47 p. 189 (primary)

This copy’s own title

SAC Newark to SAC Baltimore re NORJAK lead (duplicate copy)

Document date 24 April 1984

Part 47page 1901 pageDB Cooper-19499

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 47 p. 189.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 47, page 190 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-47:190-190

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-47:190-190

Document: Airtel SAC Newark to SAC Baltimore re NORJAK lead (duplicate copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-47:190-190
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-47%3A190-190

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 47 p. 190 (DB Cooper-19499), Airtel, dated 24 Apr 1984 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-47%3A190-190

FD-36 (Rev. 8-26-82)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ Airtel ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 4/24/84

---

TO: SAC, BALTIMORE (164A-223)

FROM: SAC, NEWARK (164A-402) (TRA) (RUC)

SUBJECT: NORJAK CAA-HIJACKING (OO: SEATTLE)

Re Baltimore airtel to Seattle, 4/2/84.

For information of receiving offices, lead set forth in referenced communication is in Philadelphia territory and is not being covered by Newark. Philadelphia in receipt of referenced airtel.

---

2-Baltimore 1-Philadelphia (Info) ☒-Seattle 1-Newark AAA/pfs (6)

---

164IA-81-8757[guess: 7] [illegible]

---

DB Cooper-19499

Serials: BA 164-223, NK 164-402