SAC Sacramento to SAC Seattle re source contact on NORJAK suspect
Document date 17 September 1985
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-48:025-026
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-48:025-026 Document: Airtel SAC Sacramento to SAC Seattle re source contact on NORJAK suspect Id: Cooper-Part-48:025-026 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-48%3A025-026 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 48 pp. 25–26 (DB Cooper-19816–19817), Airtel, dated 17 Sep 1985 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-48%3A025-026
FD-36 (Rev. 8-26-82)
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 9/17/85
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81)
FROM: SAC, SACRAMENTO (164A-50) (RUC)
NORJAK CAA-HIJACKING (A) OO: SEATTLE
---
Re Butte airtel to Seattle dated 7/24/85.
For the information of Seattle and Butte, Sacramento has maintained contact with [REDACTED] from March, 1985, until the end of May, 1985, for information that she was providing regarding [REDACTED] a possible subject in captioned matter.
Sacramento has been in contact with Butte on numerous occasions regarding this matter and has submitted communications to both Seattle and Butte regarding information furnished by [REDACTED]
Butte, in the meantime, has maintained their investiga- tion in this matter, and has in fact, on one or more occasions contacted [REDACTED] and is aware of some of his activities to date.
Sacramento source, [REDACTED] advised in May of 1985, that she no longer felt comfortable contacting [REDACTED] and asking him all the questions concerning the hijacking and felt that after three months with no activity on the part of the FBI to verify the information furnished by him, she no longer wished to contact [REDACTED] and get on with her own life. Since May of 1985, she has obtained new employment and does not contact [REDACTED]
---
SUBJECT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
(2) - Seattle 2 - Butte (164A-26) 1 - Sacramento WAB/ml (5)
---
Approved: _____________ Transmitted _____________ Per 11/4 A-81 - 8846 (Number) (Time)
---
DB Cooper-19816
SC 164A-50
---
in view of the fact that she feels it would be detrimental to her personally.
Sacramento was last in contact with [REDACTED] in late August of 1985, at which time she reiterated that she really did not want to initiate any further contact with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] as she felt the FBI was not totally interested in what he had to say. In view of the above, Sacramento does not plan on contacting [REDACTED] in the future, and inasmuch as Sacramento never received any information from the Seattle Division regarding pertinent information for [REDACTED] to use in attempting to record telephone conversation with [REDACTED] Sacramento is placing this case in RUC status.
---
SUBJECT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
2* DB Cooper-19817
---
b6 b7C b7D