SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJACK account search, negative results
This copy: Part 49 p. 20Also filed at Part 49 p. 19 (primary)
This copy’s own title
SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJACK account search (duplicate copy)
Document date 19 January 1988
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 49 p. 19.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-49:020-020
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-49:020-020 Document: Airtel SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJACK account search (duplicate copy) Id: Cooper-Part-49:020-020 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A020-020 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 49 p. 20 (DB Cooper-20095), Airtel, dated 19 Jan 1988, serial SE 164-81-8904 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A020-020
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 1/19/88
---
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81) (P)
FROM : SAC, SAN FRANCISCO (164A-220) (RUC) (SQUAD 10)
SUBJECT: NORJACK; CAA - HIJACKING OO: Seattle
Re: Seattle airtel to San Francisco, ET AL, dated 8/11/87, and San Francisco airtel to Seattle dated 9/18/87.
Administrative: Where appropriate, Privacy Act (e)(3) data was furnished to persons interviewed. Express promises of confidentiality, both limited and unlimited, have been noted where granted.
Investigation at San Francisco is negative concerning the existence of any accounts in the name of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] D.B. COOPER, or [REDACTED] with MERRILL, LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH INCORPORATED, 580 California Street, San Francisco, California.
Inasmuch as Seattle is unable to obtain a subpoena for aforementioned account records, and in the absence of further leads, San Francisco considers captioned matter RUC.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
(2) - Seattle (1) - Newark 2 - San Francisco DP/dp (5)
---
[guess: 164A-81] - 8904
---
Approved: _____________ Transmitted ____________ (Number) (Time) Per [signature] [stamp: U.S. GPO 1987 - [guess: 186]-486]
---
DB Cooper-20095
---
b6 b7C
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-8904, SF 164-220