SAC San Francisco to SAC Newark re NORJACK (file copy)
Document date 10 February 1989
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-49:205-205
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-49:205-205 Document: Airtel SAC San Francisco to SAC Newark re NORJACK (file copy) Id: Cooper-Part-49:205-205 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A205-205 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 49 p. 205 (DB Cooper-20343), Airtel, dated 10 Feb 1989, serial SE 164-81-8567 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A205-205
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile/AIRTEL ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☐ ___________ ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS 2/10/89 Date
---
TO: SAC, NEWARK (164A-402)
FROM: SAC, SAN FRANCISCO (164A-220)(C)(SQ 10)
SUBJECT: NORJACK; CAA - HIJACKING OO: SEATTLE
Re Newark airtel to Director, dated 4/13/88.
Enclosed for the Newark Division are the arrest printouts for [REDACTED] and San Francisco arrest photograph.
For the information of Newark, attempts to locate and verify [REDACTED] (phonetic) has met with negative results. A review of marriage/divorce records, using information provided by Newark, has met with negative results. Attempts to locate former friends and associates of [REDACTED] has also met with negative results.
No other investigation remains in San Francisco and this matter is being closed.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
2 - Newark (Enc. 2) 2 - Seattle 1 - San Francisco (164A-220) ELF/rmw (5)
---
Approved: _____________ Transmitted _____________ Per _____________ (Number) (Time) 164A-81-8567 [SEARCHED/INDEXED stamps] FEB 4 [illegible] FBI
DB Cooper-20343
Serials: NK 164-402, SE 164-81-8567, SF 164-220
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.