SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, with Douglas County records results
Document date 29 September 1989
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-49:387-388
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-49:387-388 Document: Airtel SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, with Douglas County records results Id: Cooper-Part-49:387-388 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A387-388 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 49 pp. 387–388 (DB Cooper-20532–20533), Airtel, dated 29 Sep 1989 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A387-388
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 9/29/89
---
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-SE-81) FROM : SAC, LAS VEGAS (RUC) SUBJECT: NORJACK UNSUB; aka D.B. COOPER, [REDACTED] NEVADA OO: SEATTLE
---
Re Seattle airtel to Las Vegas dated 8/10/89.
On 9/2/89, investigation conducted at the U.S. Post Office, [REDACTED] Nevada, concerning [REDACTED] determined that the current box holder leased the box on 2/89. This box remained unrented from 12/88 - 1/89. Prior the box had been rented from 1/88 - 6/88; however, no records are currently available at this post office for the renter of this box in 9/87. The Postmaster advised that due to the frequent turnover of post office boxes at [REDACTED] Nevada, prior subscriber records are disorganized and frequently disposed of after one year. The Postmaster did review current and past subscriber records utilizing last names and stated that the name D.B. COOPER had never been used to rent a post office box.
---
Appropriate directories, as reviewed on 9/18/89, of the [REDACTED] California area reflect that telephone number [REDACTED] was listed in [REDACTED] [REDACTED] California. The prior subscriber to this telephone number in [REDACTED] at the same [REDACTED] address. The exact dates of the listings are unknown.
---
2 - Seattle 1 - San Diego (164A-91) (Info.) 1 - Las Vegas WJ:cf (4)
---
164A-SE-81-[guess: 5064]7 SERIALIZED [FILED] [illegible] Per OCT 1 0 1989
---
Approved: [signature] (DRS) Transmitted ________ (Number) (Time)
---
DB Cooper-20532
164A-SE-81
---
Records of the DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE failed to reflect any arrest record or work card identifiable with [REDACTED] . [REDACTED] These records did reflect that [REDACTED] . white male, DOB [REDACTED] is employed at [REDACTED] [REDACTED] No arrest record was located for [REDACTED].
---
In the event Seattle Division is in need of further information concerning the telephone subscriber records to telephone number [REDACTED] the Sacramento Division at [REDACTED] California, should be requested to examine the appropriate telephone records.
---
Inasmuch as no further investigation remains, Las Vegas Division considers this matter RUC'd.
---
-2*-
---
DB Cooper-20533
---
b6 b7C
Serials: SD 164-91