SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJACK suspect, San Jose/Oakland investigation

Document date 11 February 1992

Part 50pages 62–654 pagesDB Cooper-20657–20660

Open in FBI Vault (Part 50, page 62 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-50:062-065

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-50:062-065

Document: Airtel SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJACK suspect, San Jose/Oakland investigation
Id: Cooper-Part-50:062-065
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-50%3A062-065

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 50 pp. 62–65 (DB Cooper-20657–20660), Airtel, dated 11 Feb 1992, serial 164A-SE-81 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-50%3A062-065

FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS

Date 2/11/92

---

TO SAC, SEATTLE (164A-SE-81) FROM [redacted] SAC, SAN FRANCISCO (164A-SE-81)(P)(SJRA/3) SUBJECT : NORJACK; CAA - HIJACKING OO: SEATTLE

[redacted block]

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

---

Re: Newark airtel to the Bureau dated 10/18/91.

For the information of Seattle and Newark on 11/1/91, [redacted] San Jose, California, verified that [redacted] resided in [redacted] for approximately two months until he was evicted in August or September, 1991. [redacted] was a [redacted] and drove a [redacted] pick-up, [redacted] in color with a camper shell. [redacted] advised that [redacted] was also friendly with [redacted] who resides in [redacted] allowed [redacted] to live with him for a short time before [redacted] was evicted. [redacted] was also acquainted with [redacted] [redacted] whose [redacted] located just next to [redacted] no longer resides in [redacted] and her whereabouts in unknown.

---

(2)- Seattle 2 - Newark 3 - San Francisco MGK/gmr (7)

---

164A-SE-81-[illegible] SEARCHED......... INDEXED........ SERIALIZED........ FILED......... Per _____ FEB 2 1 1992 B Cooper-20657

164A-SE-81 MGK/gmr

---

On 11/4/91, [redacted] [redacted] San Jose, California, advised he was acquainted with [redacted] when he resided during the summer of 1991 at [redacted] has not seen [redacted] and doubts that his since he was evicted from [redacted] [redacted] would know [redacted] current whereabouts.

---

On 11/4/91, [redacted] San Jose, California, advised that [redacted] left no forwarding address when he was evicted from [redacted] and still owed in excess of [redacted] in rent. [redacted] advised that [redacted] ran up in excess of [redacted] in phone bills on the phone of [redacted] [redacted] who [redacted] resided with for a short time in [redacted]

---

On 11/6/91, [redacted] San Jose, California, advised that [redacted] resided with him for a short time during the summer months of 1991. [redacted] did odd jobs as [redacted] in the San Jose area and did not appear to be a member of [redacted] drove an old [redacted] vehicle which has since been towed away. At one time [redacted] was receiving unemployment benefits while he was still residing with [redacted] advised that [redacted] ran up a rather large telephone bill, calling numerous women in the Philippines to encourage them to come to the United States and marry [redacted]

---

A review of the California Law Enforcement Teletype System (CLETS) shows that [redacted] date of birth [redacted] is in possession of a current California drivers license and last provided a current address in September, 1988, of [redacted] San Jose, California.

---

On 11/7/91, inquiry at [redacted] San Jose, California, determined that [redacted] currently resides at this address. [redacted] home telephone [redacted] [redacted] advised she first met [redacted] in 1988 through a [redacted] subsequently [redacted] [redacted] at San Jose, California. [redacted] advised that [redacted] and she subsequently received a [redacted] [redacted] has not personally seen [redacted] since at least November, 1989, and has no idea as to his current whereabouts.

---

[redacted] talked very little about his past other than. he was originally from the State of Washington and has an ex- wife by the name of [redacted]

---

2

DB Cooper-20658

164A-SE-81 MGK/gmr

---

[redacted] still occasionally receives mail for [redacted] including mail from the IRS from the State of Washington and from the State of California Board of Equalization.

---

[redacted] advised that she and [redacted] [redacted] at Great Western Savings and Loan, San Jose, California. [redacted] advised that she recalls seeing statements from Merrill Lynch in the [redacted] However, at the present time [redacted] no longer has [redacted] stated she has no means of getting in touch with [redacted] and has no recollection of any immediate family [redacted] has either in the San Jose area or in the State of Washington other than the ex-wife she already mentioned.

---

On 12/10/91, records of the Oakland, California Police Department show that on [redacted] was issued a citation for [redacted] [redacted] have a local address of [redacted] Oakland, California, Social Security number [redacted] and entered a guilty plea in traffic court on [redacted] It is noted no vehicle was indicated on the police report in connection with this citation. In addition to the above citation, [redacted] was a suspect in an [redacted] on [redacted] in Oakland, California. Local District Attorney's Office, Oakland, California, declined to issue a warrant for [redacted] in connection with this incident due to insufficient evidence. At that time [redacted] gave an address of his [redacted] [redacted] San Jose, California.

---

In addition, [redacted] was a complainant to the Oakland, California Police Department on [redacted], and [redacted] concerning an assault and battery matter, however, suspects in this matter were never fully identified and [redacted] at that time provided an address of the [redacted] [redacted] San Jose, California.

---

[redacted] according to Department of Vehicles records, is still a registered owner of a [redacted] pick-up, California license [redacted] which expires June 30, 1992, and a [redacted] California license [redacted] which is to expire in March, 1992.

---

Department of Motor Vehicles is unable to place an appropriate stop with [redacted] California drivers license so that FBI can be notified in the event [redacted] received any future citations, since he at this time is not a federal fugitive.

---

3

---

DB Cooper-20659

164A-SE-81 MGK/gmr

---

On 12/16/91, investigation at [REDACTED] Oakland, California, determined from the owners of the property of this address that [REDACTED] is unknown to them and to their knowledge [REDACTED] has never rented at this address.

---

LEADS

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

AT OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA: If feasible, place appropriate stops with Oakland Police Department and Alameda County Sheriff's Office on [REDACTED] date of birth [REDACTED] PFN number [REDACTED], in order that FBI can be notified should [REDACTED] be arrested or receive a citation.

---

AT SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA: Reinterview [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and show her composite drawing of D.B. COOPER. Will obtain other personal details of [REDACTED] life to ascertain if [REDACTED] has any characteristics similar to that of D.B. COOPER.

---

DB Cooper-20660

---

b6 b7C

Serials: 164A-SE-81, 164A-SE-81)(P)(SJRA/3