To SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect, no further leads
Document date 27 May 1992
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-50:218-219
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-50:218-219 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect, no further leads Id: Cooper-Part-50:218-219 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-50%3A218-219 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 50 pp. 218–219 (DB Cooper-20823–20824), Memo, dated 27 May 1992, serial SE 164-81-9153 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-50%3A218-219
Memorandum
To : SAC, SEATTLE (SE 164A-81) (P) Date 5/27/92
From : SA [REDACTED]
Subject: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
---
SUBJ
---
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
Re Sub: J. (miscellaneous persons); Denver's airtel to Omaha, dated 11/20/91; and Omaha's airtel to Seattle, dated 1/21/92.
[REDACTED] suggested that an individual known to her as [REDACTED] who lived in Marion, Iowa, might be identical to the unknown subject (UNSUB) in this matter. She stated she met [REDACTED] through an [REDACTED] and he was [REDACTED] On one occasion, [REDACTED] recalls seeing a [REDACTED] [REDACTED] When [REDACTED] asked, [REDACTED] he replied, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] furnished no other information which would indicate that [REDACTED] might be identical with the UNSUB, but it was a feeling that she had.
The Omaha Division advised by airtel, dated 1/21/92, that contact was made with [REDACTED] in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. [REDACTED] advised she was mistaken about [REDACTED] She had looked through a city directory and found the name [REDACTED] and she thought this person was identical to a [REDACTED] as it turns out, she later met [REDACTED] and realized he was not the same person known to her as [REDACTED] She further advised she [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and she believes she will see him again in April or May, at which time she will contact the Omaha Office to furnish further information which may lend credence to the fact that she believes [REDACTED] is identical with the UNSUB in this matter.
---
2 - Seattle (SE 164A-81) RNN:hw (2) [illegible]
---
164A-81-9153 SEARCHED.......... INDEXED.............. SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED............... MAY 2 7 1992 FBI - SEATTLE
---
DB Cooper-20823
SE 164A-81
---
In view of the above information, no leads are being set out at this time to further investigate [REDACTED] and it does not appear that there is any reason to believe [REDACTED] is identical with the UNSUB. If and when [REDACTED] provides additional information, this matter should be reviewed to determine if the possibility exists that [REDACTED] may be identical with the UNSUB.
---
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
b6 b7C
---
2*
---
DB Cooper-20824
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-9153