SAC Denver to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect investigation, RUC

Document date 16 September 1992

Part 50pages 292–2932 pagesDB Cooper-20985–20986

Open in FBI Vault (Part 50, page 292 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-50:292-293

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-50:292-293

Document: Airtel SAC Denver to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect investigation, RUC
Id: Cooper-Part-50:292-293
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-50%3A292-293

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 50 pp. 292–293 (DB Cooper-20985–20986), Airtel, dated 16 Sep 1992, serial 164A-SE-81 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-50%3A292-293

FD-36 (Rev. 11-17-88)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS

Date 9/16/92

---

TO : SAC, SEATTLE

FROM : [redacted] DENVER (164A-SE-81) (RUC)

SUBJECT : NORJAK; CAA OO: SEATTLE

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

Re Seattle airtel to Denver, dated 8/13/92.

---

Enclosed for Seattle is the original and one copy of an FD-302 reflecting contact with [redacted] on 9/8/92. Also enclosed is a photograph of [redacted] [redacted] seven and four copies of that photograph. This photograph is the one that was furnished by [redacted] to Denver Agents on 6/11/92 and was inadvertently not forwarded with Denver's communication.

As reflected on enclosed FD-302, [redacted] was contacted by SA [redacted] Pueblo, Colorado Resident Agency. She stated that she had obtained another photograph of [redacted] recently and that she had mailed that photograph to the FBI at Denver, Colorado. SA [redacted] [redacted] Denver, Colorado forwarded that photograph to Seattle by routing slip.

---

During the interview on 9/8/92, it was noted that [redacted] tends to see important connections between circumstances and events which are widely separated in time and place. She may reach conclusions based on [redacted]

---

(2) Seattle (Enc. 7) rec'd c.c. 2 - Denver TROV/pjk (4)

164A - SE - 81-9193

Approved: _______________ Transmitted _______________ Per GED 9 8 1992 (Number) (Time) 1A 844 b6 W|ENC. b7C Cooper-20985

164A-SE-81

---

[REDACTED] which is not an all together happy relationship.

Seattle should note that in setting out leads to interview [REDACTED] it should be realized that [REDACTED] may need the [REDACTED]

---

b6 b7C b7D b6 b7C

---

2*

---

DB Cooper-20986

Serials: 164A-SE-81, 164A-SE-81-9193