To SAC Seattle re caller with NORJAK information, with lead to Raymond, WA
Document date 13 January 1994
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-51:088-089
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-51:088-089 Document: Memorandum to SAC Seattle re caller with NORJAK information, with lead to Raymond, WA Id: Cooper-Part-51:088-089 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-51%3A088-089 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 51 pp. 88–89 (DB Cooper-21193–21194), Memo, dated 13 Jan 1994 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-51%3A088-089
Memorandum
To : SAC, SEATTLE (164B-81) (P) Date 1/13/94
From : SA [REDACTED]
Subject: NORJAK CAB-HIGHJACKING OO:SE
---
On 1/10,12 and 13/94 [REDACTED] (PROTECT BY REQUEST), [REDACTED] telephone [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] she may have some information re subject of this case. [REDACTED] (pronounced [REDACTED]) advised that at the time of the incident her family all looked at the/composite photo and all believed that it
---
[REDACTED BLOCK]
---
[REDACTED] could not provide any age or DOB for [REDACTED] She advised that he fit the picture in build, complexion, hair color and style and the fact that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and other family members always considered [REDACTED]. His dress was always similar to the composite, slacks, and a jacket.
---
[REDACTED] contacted the FBI on the advise of her attorney. She advised that she did not come forward earlier because of "Family connection and loyalty", but now felt that she had to tell someone.
---
Seattle general and Norjak indices negative re [REDACTED]
2- Seattle CMS:
[stamp] SEE ME, TLK[guess: RS] NS
[date stamp] JAN 1 3 1994
---
DB Cooper-21193
164B.81
---
LEAD: Seattle at Raymond, WA.
[REDACTED] Contact [REDACTED], and interview her re ex-husband [REDACTED] to determine if he could be subject in this matter. The identity of caller should be protected from [REDACTED] suggested that information re [REDACTED] could have come from someone who knew him in Oregon prior to 1971.
---
2
---
DB Cooper-21194
---
b6 b7C b7D
Serials: SE 164-81