FBI Laboratory Report of Examination, latent prints, NORJAK

Document date 16 March 2001

Part 51pages 354–3552 pagesDB Cooper-21535–21536

Open in FBI Vault (Part 51, page 354 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-51:354-355

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-51:354-355

Document: FBI Laboratory Report of Examination, latent prints, NORJAK
Id: Cooper-Part-51:354-355
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-51%3A354-355

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 51 pp. 354–355 (DB Cooper-21535–21536), Report, dated 16 Mar 2001 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-51%3A354-355

7-1 (Rev. 5-13-99)

---

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION LABORATORY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

---

To: SAC, Las Vegas VCMO, Squad #5 Date: March 16, 2001

Case ID No.: 164-HQ-2111 Lab No.: 001030004 DQ

Reference: Communication dated October 26, 2000

Your No.:

Title: NORJAK; CAA - Hijacking

---

Date specimens received:

The result of the latent print examination is included in this report.

---

(1)Seattle (SE 164A-81) 9364

---

Page 1 of 1

---

SEARCHED _______ [illegible]XED SERIALIZED _______ [illegible]ED

[illegible] 5 6 2001

FI [illegible]ATTLE [signature/initials]

---

This Report is Furnished for Official Use Only

---

DB Cooper-21535

7-1a (Rev. 5-18-99)

FBI LABORATORY FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Report of Examination

Examiner Name: [REDACTED] Date: March 16, 2001 Unit: Latent Print Phone No.: (202) 324-6177 Case ID No.: 164-HQ-2111 Lab No.: 001030004 DQ

Results of Examinations:

Seventy-seven latent fingerprints previously reported and remaining unidentified in this case are not the fingerprints of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] The remaining latent fingerprints, from the tip, side and lower joint areas, and the latent impression, fingerprint or palm print, were compared with the available fingerprints of [REDACTED] but no identification was effected.

Clearly and completely recorded major case prints are needed for conclusive comparisons.

LPU - Page 1 of 1

—This Report is Furnished for Official Use Only— DB Cooper-21536

---

b6 b7C

b6 b7C

Serials: SE 164-81