SAC Sacramento to SAC Seattle re acquaintances who felt NORJAK suspect not identical with Unsub
This copy: Part 56 pp. 79–80Also filed at Part 20 pp. 195–196 (primary) · Part 104 pp. 332–333
This copy’s own title
SAC Sacramento to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect cleared
Document date 24 January 1972
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 20 pp. 195–196.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-56:079-080
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-56:079-080 Document: Airtel SAC Sacramento to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect cleared Id: Cooper-Part-56:079-080 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-56%3A079-080 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 56 pp. 79–80 (DB Cooper-23469–23470), Airtel, dated 24 Jan 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-56%3A079-080
1/24/72
---
AIRTEL
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, SACRAMENTO (164-50)(P) SUBJECT: NORJAK
Re Los Angeles teletype to Seattle, 1/3/72. RE: SUSPECT [REDACTED]
---
ADMINISTRATIVE:
On 1/11/72, source in position to obtain such information, advised that [REDACTED] California Driver's License Number [REDACTED] currently holds [REDACTED] [REDACTED] which was opened 6/4/71, at which time [REDACTED] listed employment as [REDACTED], [REDACTED] California. This individual formerly received mail through [REDACTED] which is listed to [REDACTED] California.
---
The following investigation was conducted by SA [REDACTED] AT [REDACTED] CALIFORNIA On 1/12/72, [REDACTED]
---
2 - Seattle 1 - Las Vegas (164-60)(Info) 1 - Los Angeles (164-497)(Info) 2 - Sacramento JRN:kdw (6)
---
[handwritten routing numbers, partially illegible] DB Cooper-23469
SC 164-56
---
[REDACTED] all of whom have known [REDACTED] since the Summer of 1971, stated they felt confident [REDACTED] is not identical with Unsub. [REDACTED] who advised he last employed [REDACTED] on 11/11/71, advised [REDACTED] has held various part-time employments since that time but he is unaware of specific employers. All of the above have advised that they have known [REDACTED] as a resident of the [REDACTED] area and that while none could specifically place him in the area on 11/24/71, all stated that they are unaware of any prolonged absences from the area by [REDACTED] nor are they aware of any absences from the area other than an occasional trip to the Los Angeles, California, area where he may have [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED] also advised that [REDACTED] presently resides in the [REDACTED] the [REDACTED] California.
---
All of the above individuals described [REDACTED] as no more than 5'8" in height, 150 pounds, and slight build and all stated that the composite description of Unsub bears little resemblances to him since [REDACTED] jaw is much more square than that depicted in the composite and that he has a full head of hair with no receding temples.
---
In view of the above, Las Vegas discontinue regarding suspect [REDACTED] and the Sacramento Office contemplates no further investigation in this regard.
---
UNKNOWN SUBJECT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
b6 b7c
---
DB Cooper-23470
---
- 2 -
Serials: LA 164-497, LV 164-60, SC 164-50, SC 164-56, SE 164-81