Nitel SAC Los Angeles to SAC Sacramento re NORJAK suspect and alias
Document date 8 February 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-56:120-120
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-56:120-120 Document: Nitel SAC Los Angeles to SAC Sacramento re NORJAK suspect and alias Id: Cooper-Part-56:120-120 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-56%3A120-120 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 56 p. 120 (DB Cooper-23510), Teletype, dated 8 Feb 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-56%3A120-120
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 2/8/72
Transmit the following in ___PLAINTEXT___ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via ___TELETYPE___ ___NITEL___ (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SACRAMENTO
FROM: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497)
NORJACK.
RE/SUSPECT [REDACTED] ALSO KNOWN AS [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
THE NAME OF [REDACTED] [REDACTED] LOS ANGELES, WAS PREVIOUSLY FURNISHED AS A POSSIBLE SUSPECT IN THIS CASE BY [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA, AND [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] INDICATED THE REASON THEY WERE [handwritten correction: FOR] FURNISHING [REDACTED] NAME WAS DUE TO A CONVERSATION WITH [REDACTED]
---
1 - Minneapolis (AM) 1 - Portland (AM) 1 - Seattle (AM)
164-497 crs:jc (4)
---
164-497 SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED FILED
---
Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge
Sent ___SC___ 10^03 M Per ___[initials]___
DB Cooper-23510 GPO: 1970 O - 402-735
---
b6 b7C
Serials: LA 164-497