SAC Pittsburgh to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing FD-302
Document date 2 March 1972
Also filed at: Part 23 p. 194
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-56:169-169
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-56:169-169 Document: Airtel SAC Pittsburgh to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing FD-302 Id: Cooper-Part-56:169-169 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-56%3A169-169 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 56 p. 169 (DB Cooper-23569), Airtel, dated 2 Mar 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-56%3A169-169
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 3/2/72
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL _______________ (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, PITTSBURGH (164-93)(P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK
Re Pittsburgh tel to Seattle, 2/18/72
Re suspect [REDACTED]
Enclosed for Seattle are 9 copies of an FD 302 concerning interview of [REDACTED] re suspect [REDACTED] and one 1 copy each for the info of Denver, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Sacramento.
CONSIDER SUBJECT DANGEROUS
---
2 - Seattle (Enc.-9) 1 - Denver (Enc.-1) (164-98)(Info) 1 - Los Angeles (Enc.-1)(164-497)(Info) 1 - San Francisco (Enc.-1) (164-220)(Info) 1 - Sacramento (Enc.-1) (164-50)(Info) 2 - Pittsburgh
CJL/cjw (8)
---
164-419[?] SEARCHED___INDEXED SERIALIZED___FILED MAR 10 1972 [illegible]
---
Approved: _______________ Sent ___________ M Per ___________ Special Agent in Charge
DB Cooper-23569
U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1971-413-138
Serials: DN 164-98, LA 164-497, PG 164-93, SC 164-50, SE 164-81, SF 164-220
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.