Urgent teletype Seattle to Director, Los Angeles and New York re NORJAK subpoena duces tecum and complaint
Document date 29 April 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-59:030-032
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-59:030-032 Document: Urgent teletype Seattle to Director, Los Angeles and New York re NORJAK subpoena duces tecum and complaint Id: Cooper-Part-59:030-032 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-59%3A030-032 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 59 pp. 30–32 (DB Cooper-24172–24174), Teletype, dated 29 Apr 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-59%3A030-032
NR091 SE PLAIN 5:05 PM URGENT 4/29/72 DCA TO DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111) LOS ANGELES (164-497) NEW YORK (164-627) FROM SEATTLE (164-81)(P) 3P
---
NORJAK
RE NEW YORK TEL APRIL TWENTY NINE INSTANT ADVISING THAT [REDACTED] HAD INFORMED [REDACTED] NOT TO RELEASE THE [REDACTED] AND [REDACTED] IN ABSENCE OF A SUBPOENA. THIS CASE WAS DISCUSSED AT LENGTH TODAY WITH STANLEY PITKIN, USA, SEATTLE. MR. PITKIN IS ISSUING A SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TODAY DIRECTED TO [REDACTED] [REDACTED] NEW YORK, NEW YORK. USA PITKIN STATED HE FELT IT WAS NECESSARY TO ADDRESS THE SUBPOENA IN THIS MANNER RATHER THAN TO [REDACTED] SINCE IT APPEARS THAT [REDACTED] IS NOT IN FACT [REDACTED] AT THIS POINT. THE SUBPOENA CALLS FOR "PRODUCTION OF RECORDS AND MATERIALS PREVIOUSLY DELIVERED INTO YOUR POSSESSION BY [REDACTED] END PAGE ONE.
---
164-497 - [stamp] SEARCHED......INDEXED...... SERIALIZED......CK..FILED...... [partial date] 0 01972 ES [initials]
---
DB Cooper-24172
PAGE TWO SE 164-81
---
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
---
THIS SUBPOENA SHOULD BE SERVED IMMEDIATELY UPON [REDACTED] BY AGENTS OF THE NEW YORK OFFICE, UACB.
IF [REDACTED] SOUGHT IS OBTAINED, THE [REDACTED] FOR THE [REDACTED] SHOULD BE FORWARDED IMMEDIATELY TO THE FBI LABORATORY BY COURIER FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXAMINING THE DOCU- MENT. THE HANDWRITING SHOULD BE COMPARED WITH KNOWN HAND WRITING OF [REDACTED] APPEARING ON HIS FINGERPRINT CARD AND ON WAIVER FORM FORWARDED BY SEATTLE ON APRIL TWENTY NINE, INSTANT. FINGERPRINTS DEVELOPED, IF ANY, SHOULD BE COMPARED WITH
END PAGE TWO
---
DB Cooper-24173
PAGE THREE SE 164-81
---
THE FINGERPRINTS OF [REDACTED] FBI NO. [REDACTED] . THE REMAINING [REDACTED] THAT IS [REDACTED] SHOULD BE FORWARDED DIRECTLY TO SEATTLE.
MR. PITKIN ADVISED THAT HE WILL PREPARE A COMPLAINT ON MOR- NING OF MAY ONE, NEXT CHARING ITSP AND WARRANTS WILL BE ISSUED FOR [REDACTED] SEALE AGENTS LATHEMAY ONE NEXT.
THE BUREAU WILL BE KEPT FULLY INFORMED.
E N D
DJW
FBI LOS ANGELES CLR
---
b3 b6 b7C
---
DB Cooper-24174
Serials: 164-2111, LA 164-497, NY 164-627, SE 164-81