Acting SAC St. Louis to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect formerly at Edwards Air Force Base
This copy: Part 60 pp. 47–48Also filed at Part 28 pp. 100–101 (primary) · Part 60 pp. 45–46
This copy’s own title
Acting SAC St. Louis to SAC Seattle re second NORJAK suspect supplied by source
Document date 22 September 1972
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 28 pp. 100–101.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-60:047-048
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-60:047-048 Document: Memo Acting SAC St. Louis to SAC Seattle re second NORJAK suspect supplied by source Id: Cooper-Part-60:047-048 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-60%3A047-048 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 60 pp. 47–48 (DB Cooper-24695–24696), Memo, dated 22 Sep 1972, serial LA 164-497-563 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-60%3A047-048
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 9-22-72
ACTING SAC, ST. LOUIS (164-63) P
NORJAK OO: Seattle
Re Seattle letter to St. Louis, 9-6-72.
RE: [REDACTED] (phonetic)
For the information of Los Angeles, [REDACTED] supplied as a possible suspect by [REDACTED] on June 18, 1972. At that time, [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] fit description of UNSUB and had previously been a [REDACTED] on the [REDACTED] but was now [REDACTED] for United Air Lines.
Investigation by Seattle Division revealed [REDACTED] under all possible spelling combinations never employed with United Air Lines in any capacity. Further, [REDACTED] not employed at Boeing Aircraft Corporation, and credit, criminal, and DMV checks at Seattle concerning [REDACTED] all negative.
On 9-18-72, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised [REDACTED] was never employed by [REDACTED] but that he did know of him. [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] (possibly spelled [REDACTED] took part in [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] thought that [REDACTED] was attached to the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and that he was probably a member of the [REDACTED] If he is a member of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] magazine, Lancaster, California, telephone [REDACTED] would be
---
2 - Seattle 3 - Los Angeles 2 - St. Louis LDC:ss 7
---
164-497-563 SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED FILED SEP 28 1972 ANGELES
---
DB Cooper-24695 case assigned
SL 164-63
able to locate him. In addition, [REDACTED] advised that personnel at NASA facility, Edwards Air Force Base, should also be able to locate [REDACTED]
---
L E A D S
THE LOS ANGELES DIVISION
AT LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA
Will contact [REDACTED] through telephone [REDACTED] and determine if suspect previously employed as [REDACTED]. If so, obtain full background and descriptive information in order to eliminate him as suspect.
AT EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE
Will contact appropriate officials of NASA and cover same lead as set forth above.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
2
---
DB Cooper-24696
Serials: LA 164-497-563, SE 164-81, SL 164-63
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.