Interview of New York Times employee re receipt of anonymous letter
Dictated 13 October 1972Transcribed 18 October 1972
Also filed at: Part 72 p. 97 · Part 73 p. 275
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-60:070-070
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-60:070-070 Document: FD-302 interview of New York Times employee re receipt of anonymous letter Id: Cooper-Part-60:070-070 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-60%3A070-070 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 60 p. 70 (DB Cooper-24725), FD-302 interview, dictated 13 Oct 1972, serial 64-497-S76 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-60%3A070-070
FD-302 (REV. 11-27-70)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Date of transcription 10/18/72
---
[REDACTED] New York Times b6 229 West 43rd Street, New York, New York, advised that the hand- b7C written letter [REDACTED] was received over the weekend of September 23, 1972. He stated that the letter was passed from Department to Department for about two weeks and was handled by a number of clerks and editors before he received it approximately ten days ago. He declined to estimate the number of people who handled the letter adding that it would be impossible to determine the number or identities of those people.
[REDACTED] continued that [REDACTED] no present plans for publica- b6 tion of the letter. He advised that a photocopy of the letter was b7C forwarded [REDACTED] in the San Diego, California, area. He named [REDACTED] [REDACTED] California, telephone [REDACTED] explained that [REDACTED] determined from the letter's postmark that the letter had been mailed within a one hundred mile radius of San Diego but outside San Diego's city limits. He said [REDACTED] had requested the local Bureau of Vital Statistics to furnish a list of all deaths on [REDACTED] but [REDACTED] discovered such records are not filed by date. He related that to his knowledge no one else has made any attempt to determine the letter's accuracy or authenticity.
---
/64-497-S76 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED SERIALIZED [REDACTED] FILED [REDACTED] OCT 2 5 1972 [REDACTED]GELES [REDACTED] b6 b7C
---
Interviewed on 10/17/72 at New York, New York File # NY 164-627
by SA RONALD D. HOPOUS:mmz Date dictated 10/13/72
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
DB Cooper-24725
Serials: 64-497-S76, NY 164-627
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.