SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect, with interview of former coworkers
This copy: Part 60 pp. 414–416Also filed at Part 33 pp. 8–12 (primary) · Part 95 pp. 408–412
This copy’s own title
SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing photograph of suspect described by former coworkers, with Portland lead
Document date 15 November 1973
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 33 pp. 8–12.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-60:414-416
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-60:414-416 Document: Airtel SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing photograph of suspect described by former coworkers, with Portland lead Id: Cooper-Part-60:414-416 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-60%3A414-416 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 60 pp. 414–416 (DB Cooper-25098, DB Cooper-25101, DB Cooper-25102), Airtel, dated 15 Nov 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-60%3A414-416
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 11/15/73
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via __AIRTEL____________AIR MAIL_________ (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497) (P) SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: Seattle
Re Los Angeles airtel to Seattle, dated 11/9/73.
RE [REDACTED b6/b7C]
Enclosed for receiving offices are two copies each of a photograph of captioned individual, which has been described by three former fellow employees at [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Glendale, California, as an excellent likeness.
On 11/13/73, [REDACTED] also b6 known [REDACTED] was interviewed at the Los Angeles b7C Office of the FBI. [REDACTED] advised she continues to reside [REDACTED], Canoga Park, California. She stated she has had absolutely no contact [REDACTED] about November 21, 1971. She advised [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED — entire block redacted, b6/b7C]
---
3 - Seattle (164-81) (Encl 2) 3 - Portland (164-41) (Encl 2) 2 - Minneapolis (164-73) (Encl 2) (2)- Los Angeles
CRS/heh (10)
---
[Signature] [guess: 164-497] — 7/8 SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED FILED
Approved: [Signature] ________ Sent ________ M Per ________ Special Agent in Charge
U.S.Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574 DB Cooper-25098
LA 164-497
She stated last year her income taxes were audited by Internal Revenue Service and it had been necessary for [REDACTED] to be contacted in Belingham. She advised she had not retained his address or telephone number.
About two years prior [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] in Los Angeles. He never suffered
[REDACTED] stated she maintains contact with [REDACTED], also known as [REDACTED] in Visalia, California, and also with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] She is certain that they have no information concerning [REDACTED] she does not know. She recently contacted [REDACTED]
---
On 11/13/73, [REDACTED] Temple City, California, representative of [REDACTED] advised [REDACTED]
an address at [REDACTED] in Glendale, California and does not respond to correspondence directed to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] He stated he has no information indicating [REDACTED]
---
A review of previous investigation reveals Redondo Beach, California, Police Department and the Los Angeles Sheriff's Office, Harbor Division, were involved in the search [REDACTED] No information was developed indicating the United States Coast Guard was involved.
On 11/9/73, [REDACTED] West Valley Division, Los Angeles Police Department, which has jurisdiction over the
- 4 -
---
DB Cooper-25101
LA 164-497
---
area where [REDACTED] advised they have no record identifiable with [REDACTED]. In view of the above, it is suggested the following investigation -- be conducted:
---
Seattle, Portland and Minneapolis display enclosed photographs of [REDACTED] to appropriate witnesses.
---
LEADS
PORTLAND
AT MONMOUTH, OREGON: Thereafter, interview [REDACTED] [REDACTED] through address of [REDACTED] Monmouth, Oregon, for purpose of resolving whether or not he warrants additional investigation as a suspect in this matter and attempt to ascertain purpose of his apparent desire to conceal his whereabouts.
---
It is suggested that the taking of major case prints of [REDACTED] be considered at the time of interview and submitted to the Identification Division for comparison with unidentified latents in this matter and so that identity may be positively established.
---
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
- 5* -
DB Cooper-25102
Serials: LA 164-497, MP 164-73, PD 164-41, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.