SAC Los Angeles to Director (FBI Laboratory) re latent print comparison
This copy: Part 61 pp. 19–20Also filed at Part 34 pp. 103–105 (primary) · Part 96 pp. 102–104
This copy’s own title
SAC Los Angeles to Director (Attn: FBI Laboratory) re NORJAK fingerprint comparison
Document date 27 March 1974
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 34 pp. 103–105.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-61:019-020
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-61:019-020 Document: Airtel SAC Los Angeles to Director (Attn: FBI Laboratory) re NORJAK fingerprint comparison Id: Cooper-Part-61:019-020 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-61%3A019-020 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 61 pp. 19–20 (DB Cooper-25170), Airtel, dated 27 Mar 1974 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-61%3A019-020
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 3/27/74
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIR MAIL - REGISTERED (Priority) -------------------------------------------------------
---
TO: DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111) ATTN: FBI LABORATORY
FROM: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497) (P)
RE: NORJAK OO: Seattle
---
Enclosed for the Bureau are two fingerprints cards containing known finger and palm prints of [REDACTED] and one envelope containing known head hair samples of [REDACTED]
The enclosed items were furnished by the Glendale, California, Police Department on 3/26/74, following [REDACTED]
Previous investigation by the Los Angeles Division concerning [REDACTED] has revealed he disappeared under unusual circumstances a short time prior to the hijacking, has changed his name and appearance and was in the Portland, Oregon, area at the time this crime occurred. He should be considered a possible suspect in this matter.
The suspect, who declined to identify himself or sign the fingerprint cards at Glendale Police Department, is described as follows:
---
3 - Bureau (Encl 3) (RM) 2 - Las Vegas (164-60) 2 - Portland (164-41) 2 - Seattle (164-81) 2 - Los Angeles
---
OFFICE COPY
CRS/trb (11)
Approved: ________ Special Agent in Charge Sent _________ M Per _________ U.S.Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574
---
164-497-[illegible]
LA 164-497
---
The Identification Division is requested to compare the enclosed finger and palm prints of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] with unidentified latent prints in this matter.
---
LEADS
LAS VEGAS
AT LAS VEGAS, NEVADA: Resubmit to the FBI Laboratory the glass microscopic slide containing the hair clipping removed from the seat of the victim aircraft which was believed occupied by the unsub, so the Laboratory can make microscopic comparisons of enclosed hair clippings of [REDACTED]
---
b6 b7C b6 b7C
---
- 3* -
---
DB Cooper-25170
Serials: 164-2111, LA 164-497, LV 164-60, PD 164-41, SE 164-81