SA to SAC Los Angeles re Canoga Park apartment occupant resembling Cooper sketch
Document date 24 November 1976
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-61:265-266
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-61:265-266 Document: Memo SA to SAC Los Angeles re Canoga Park apartment occupant resembling Cooper sketch Id: Cooper-Part-61:265-266 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-61%3A265-266 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 61 pp. 265–266 (DB Cooper-25474–25475), Memo, dated 24 Nov 1976, serial LA 164-497-876 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-61%3A265-266
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 JULY 1973 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497) DATE: 11/24/76
FROM : SA [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: NORJAK
Re FD-71 of SA [REDACTED] 11/14/76.
RE: [REDACTED]
---
Based on information provided by [REDACTED] on 11/14/76, wherein she stated that the occupant of [REDACTED] Canoga Park, California, closely resembled the artist's conception of the subject of this matter as it appeared in the Los Angeles Times on 11/14/76, the following investigation was conducted:
On 11/16/76, [REDACTED] Canoga Park, California, advised that the occupant of [REDACTED] in her opinion closely resembled the artist's conception of the hijacker. She advised she has [REDACTED] and has had an She advised that the [REDACTED] who [REDACTED] at the apartments, [REDACTED] resides at [REDACTED] Simi Valley, California, telephone [REDACTED] would also have had [REDACTED] while she [REDACTED]
On 11/18/76, [REDACTED] at the same address, advised she had [REDACTED] however, and did not personally know the tenants in [REDACTED] displayed an application which indicated the lone occupant of [REDACTED] was [REDACTED] His employment was shown as Hughes Aircraft, Roscoe and Fallbrook. He occupied the apartment on 6/22/76, and at that time furnished his address as [REDACTED] Simi Valley, California. He indicated he was an [REDACTED] for Hughes Aircraft and had work telephone [REDACTED] His last place of residence
---
164-497-876
---
SEARCHED......INDEXED SERIALIZED [REDACTED] FILED [REDACTED] NOV 29 1976 FBI — LOS ANGELES
---
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB Cooper-25474
LA 164-497
---
from [REDACTED] was shown as [REDACTED] Tucson, Arizona, where he also was employed as [REDACTED] for Hughes Aircraft. These records indicated he possessed a [REDACTED] Arizona plates [REDACTED] A close relative was listed as [REDACTED] Cleveland, Ohio (father).
---
On 11/23/76, [REDACTED] was interviewed by SA [REDACTED] and SA [REDACTED] at his apartment, [REDACTED] He was noted to bear a resemblance to the artist's conception as it had appeared in the Los Angeles Times on 11/14/76. However, he was also noted to have very light brown hair and a light complexion in contrast to the description of the subject of this matter who was described as having a dark complexion, Latin appearing, and dark brown or black hair. [REDACTED] displayed a California Driver's License [REDACTED] which indicated he was born on [REDACTED] male, brown hair, brown eyes, 5'10", 160 pounds, last license issued in Arizona. He further displayed an identification card of Hughes Aircraft Company, bearing his name and photograph and [REDACTED]
---
It is noted that both in appearance and per date of birth of [REDACTED] as shown on his driver's license, [REDACTED] is younger than the hijacker as described by witnesses in this matter as the minimum age placed on the subject was [REDACTED] years in 1971.
---
In view of the above, it does not appear additional investigation concerning [REDACTED] as a suspect in this matter is warranted at this time.
---
- 2*-
DB Cooper-25475
Serials: LA 164-497, LA 164-497-876