Director to Minneapolis, Seattle and Los Angeles re NORJAK

Document date 22 July 1977

Part 61page 4071 pageDB Cooper-25655

Open in FBI Vault (Part 61, page 407 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-61:407-407

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-61:407-407

Document: Teletype Director to Minneapolis, Seattle and Los Angeles re NORJAK
Id: Cooper-Part-61:407-407
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-61%3A407-407

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 61 p. 407 (DB Cooper-25655), Teletype, dated 22 Jul 1977, serial LA 164-497-948 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-61%3A407-407

TELETYPE ROOM JUL 22 5 31 PM '77

---

H00552 2040030 RR LA MP SE DE HQ R 230005Z JUL 77 FM DIRECTOR (164-2111) TO MINNEAPOLIS (164-73) (ROUTINE) SEATTLE (164-81) (ROUTINE) LOS ANGELES (164-497) (ROUTINE) BT CLEAR NORJAK. OO: SEATTLE

REMPTEL TO THE BUREAU DATED JULY 21, 1977.

THE INTERVIEW OF [REDACTED] BY MINNEAPOLIS APPARENTLY DEVELOPED INFORMATION THAT [REDACTED] TOLD [REDACTED] THAT HE HAD THE COMPLETE FBI FILE ON THE NORJAK HIJACKING WHICH HE RECEIVED ON THE "WEST COAST", AND THAT [REDACTED] THINKS THAT [REDACTED] [REDACTED] WHO WORKS FOR THE FBI.

MINNEAPOLIS WILL REINTERVIEW [REDACTED] IN PERSON AND OBTAIN EVERY DETAIL HE HAS CONCERNING [REDACTED] STATEMENT THAT HE HAD FBI FILES, THE WORDS HE USED, AND THE CONTEXT IN WHICH HE MADE THE STATEMENT. SEATTLE WILL REVIEW BACK- GROUND DATA FURNISHED BY [REDACTED] TO DETERMINE IF [REDACTED] [REDACTED] WORKING FOR THE FBI. BT

---

164-497-948 [illegible stamp/initials] 1. [REDACTED] 2. Alston [initials]

---

DB Cooper-25655

Serials: 164-2111, LA 164-497, LA 164-497-948, MP 164-73, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.