Minneapolis to Director re NORJAK: proposed motion picture claim
Document date 2 August 1977
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-62:105-106
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-62:105-106 Document: Teletype Minneapolis to Director re NORJAK: proposed motion picture claim Id: Cooper-Part-62:105-106 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-62%3A105-106 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 62 pp. 105–106 (DB Cooper-25669–25670), Teletype, dated 2 Aug 1977 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-62%3A105-106
TELETYPE ROOM Aug 2 2 32 PM '77
---
MP0003 RR HQ AT DN LV LR LA SD SE DE MP R 022120Z J AUG 77 FM MINNEAPOLIS (164-73) (P) TO DIRECTOR (164-2111) ROUTINE ATLANTA (164-254) ROUTINE DENVER (164-98) ROUTINE LAS VEGAS (164-60) ROUTINE LITTLE ROCK (164-22) ROUTINE LOS ANGELES (164-497) ROUTINE SAN DIEGO (164-91) ROUTINE SEATTLE (164-81) ROUTINE BT CLEAR NORJAK; OO: SEATTLE RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO MINNEAPOLIS DATED JULY 23, 1977, ET AL. [REDACTED] REINTERVIEWED AUGUST 1, 1977. UNABLE TO RECALL EXACTWORDS USED BY [REDACTED] RECALLS [REDACTED] TALKING ABOUT KNOWING WHO D.B. COOPER WAS AND THAT THIS INDIVIDUAL, NAME NOT STATED, HAD CRIMINAL HISTORY OR CRIMINAL
---
164-497 952 [guess: history] [guess: apd]
---
DB Cooper-25669
---
b6 b7C
PAGE TWO MP 164-73 CLEAR FILE FOUR PAGES LONG WHICH WAS SINGLE SPACED. [REDACTED] TOLD [REDACTED] THAT HE, [REDACTED] HAD PERMISSION OF THE WEST COAST FBI, FBI HEADQUARTERS IN WASHINGTON, AND GRIFFIN BELL TO MAKE A MOVIE ABOUT THE HIJACKING. [REDACTED] HAD INFORMATION ON THE HIJACKING, BUT EVERYTHING HE KNEW COULD HAVE COME FROM NEWSPAPERS AND MAGAZINES. [REDACTED] DID NOT HAVE ANY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. [REDACTED] HEARD FROM UNRECALLED SOURCE THAT [REDACTED] HAD [REDACTED] NEITHER [REDACTED] NOR ANYONE ELSE, HAS EVER TOLD OR IMPLIED TO [REDACTED] THAT [REDACTED] OR ANY FBI EMPLOYEE GAVE [REDACTED] ANY FILE, OR ANY INFORMATION WHATSOEVER ABOUT THE HIJACKING. [REDACTED] HAD NO FACTUAL BASIS WHATSOEVER FOR THE THOUGHT SOMETHING ALONG THESE LINES CONCEIVABLY COULD HAVE HAPPENED. HIS THOUGHT WAS THE RESULT OF PURE SPECULATION AND CONJECTURE ON [REDACTED] PART. [REDACTED] STATED HE WORKED FOR UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, AND HAD ADDRESS, [REDACTED] CALIFORNIA [REDACTED] BT
---
DB Cooper-25670
---
b6 b7C
Serials: 164-2111, AT 164-254, DN 164-98, LA 164-497, LR 164-22, LV 164-60, MP 164-73, SD 164-91, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.