SAC Seattle to SAC Las Vegas re NORJAK (copy 1)

This copy: Part 62 p. 134Also filed at Part 41 p. 234 (primary) · Part 41 p. 235

This copy’s own title

SAC Seattle to SAC Las Vegas re NORJAK suspect background

Document date 20 January 1978

Part 62page 1341 page

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 41 p. 234.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 62, page 134 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-62:134-134

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-62:134-134

Document: Airtel SAC Seattle to SAC Las Vegas re NORJAK suspect background
Id: Cooper-Part-62:134-134
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-62%3A134-134

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 62 p. 134, Airtel, dated 20 Jan 1978 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-62%3A134-134

FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)

FBI

Date: 1/20/78

Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)

Via AIRTEL (Precedence)

---

TO : SAC, LAS VEGAS (164-60)

FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)(P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK (A) BUfile 164-2111 OO: SEATTLE

RE: [REDACTED]

---

Re San Francisco airtel to Seattle dated 1/12/78.

Although it appears [REDACTED] is too young to be identical with UNSUB in this matter, receiving offices are requested to attempt to verify background/information concerning [REDACTED] contained in referenced communication. In particular, [REDACTED] source of income is of interest.

The above lead is set out in anticipation that a preliminary investigation will be conducted concerning [REDACTED] following the guidelines set out in Seattle report of SA [REDACTED] dated 5/30/73. Results should be immediately forwarded to Seattle for evaluation and at that time, a determination will be made whether further investigation concerning [REDACTED] is warranted.

ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

---

2 - Las Vegas (164-60) (2)- Los Angeles (164-497) 2 - San Francisco (164-220) 3 - Seattle (164-81) RNN:arm (9)

---

[guess: 161] - 11-964 JAN [illegible] OO:SE [illegible] W/[guess: Seu] 963

---

Approved: ______ Sent _____ M Per ________

Serials: 164-2111, LA 164-497, LV 164-60, SE 164-81, SF 164-220

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.