SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re VA record check on NORJACK suspect

Document date 17 September 1981

Part 62page 2391 pageDB Cooper-25952

Open in FBI Vault (Part 62, page 239 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-62:239-239

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-62:239-239

Document: Airtel SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re VA record check on NORJACK suspect
Id: Cooper-Part-62:239-239
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-62%3A239-239

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 62 p. 239 (DB Cooper-25952), Airtel, dated 17 Sep 1981, serial LA 164-497-1025 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-62%3A239-239

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET X AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 9/17/81

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497██) (C-1) (RUC)

SUBJECT: NORJACK OO: Seattle

Reference Sacramento airtel to Los Angeles dated 9/3/81. Records, Veteran's Administration Reginal Center, 11000 Wishire Boulevard, Los Angeles, as reviewed on 9/16/81, disclosed that [REDACTED] date of birth [REDACTED] has a 20 percent Veteran's Administration (VA) disability. [REDACTED] receives his monthly disability check at [REDACTED] Port Lavaca, Texas. No additional investigation remains at Los Angeles therefore this matter is considered RUC.

---

2 - Seattle (1)- Los Angeles

JTV/rsr (3)

OFFICE COPY

Approved: [signature] Transmitted ________ (Number) (Time)

164-497-1025

SEARCHED —— PeNDEXED —— SERIALIZED —— FILED ——

DB Cooper-25952

---

b6 b7C

Serials: LA 164-497, LA 164-497-1025, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.