SAC Albany to SAC Portland re Whitehall, New York tip on Cooper photograph
This copy: Part 63 p. 109Also filed at Part 43 p. 364 (primary) · Part 43 p. 366
This copy’s own title
SAC Albany to SAC Portland re Whitehall, NY tip on published Cooper photograph
Document date 26 February 1980
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 43 p. 364.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-63:109-109
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-63:109-109 Document: Airtel SAC Albany to SAC Portland re Whitehall, NY tip on published Cooper photograph Id: Cooper-Part-63:109-109 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-63%3A109-109 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 63 p. 109 (DB Cooper-26482), Airtel, dated 26 Feb 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-63%3A109-109
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78) FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☐ ________ ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS AIRTEL Date 2/26/80
---
TO: SAC, PORTLAND FROM: [redacted] SAC, ALBANY (164-NEW) (RUC) SUBJECT: UNSUB; SUBS: [illegible] D.B. COOPER CRIME ABOARD AIRCRAFT OO: PD On 2/13/80, [redacted], Whitehall, New York, advised that he observed the photograph of unsub in connection with recent newspaper publicity and he and his family members believe the photograph bears a strong resemblance to [redacted] DOB [redacted] He advised he believes [redacted] Air Force serial number to be [redacted]
[redacted] advised that little is known regarding [redacted] since approximately 1950. [redacted] served in the U.S. Air Force and was a [redacted] [redacted] Following his discharge, he was believed to reside in Texas and known to engage in a [redacted] [redacted] Wallingford, Vermont, have been telephonically contacted periodically by [redacted] regarding [redacted] whereabouts. No contacts have been made in the 1970's and [redacted] has knowledge of [redacted] whereabouts or activities prior to the mid 1960's.
The above submitted to the OO for elimination purposes or further investigative leads at the discretion of the OO.
---
(2) Portland 1-Albany EFC:njd (3)
---
SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ MAR 3 1980 FBI-PORTLAND 164 - 81 = [illegible] SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ MAR 8 1980 Per _____ FBI - SEATTLE
---
Approved: _________ Transmitted _________ Per _________ (Number) (Time) FBI - SEATTLE DB Cooper-26482
Serials: 164-NEW
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.