ASAC Bibler to SAC Seattle re call to ASAC Rosack, Sacramento
Document date 12 January 1972
Also filed at: Part 65 p. 375
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-64:274-274
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-64:274-274 Document: Memo ASAC Bibler to SAC Seattle re call to ASAC Rosack, Sacramento Id: Cooper-Part-64:274-274 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-64%3A274-274 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 64 p. 274, Memo, dated 12 Jan 1972, serial SE 164-81-1880 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-64%3A274-274
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 1/12/72
ASAC PAUL R. BIBLER
NORJAK
On 1/12/72 I called ASAC ROSACK at Sacramento. I told him we were temporarily stymied in our search of the area as to where the hijacker could have possibly jumped pending decisions from them as to whether the photo reconnaissance plane was going to photograph the area and read the photos for us before we tried to do a foot search.
After checking he said they were going to do it; they had the map of the area and the first good day when the light was right, they would do it. It would not take long after that that the photos could be studied and analysed, (he thought it would be only a few days that we would have the results.) We will be advised.
I called the Bureau and talked to HENRY SHUTZ. I told him that the SAC had wanted him to know the reason we had not come in with a request in connection with a terrain search of the suspect drop area, was that we felt it would be well to have an aerial reconnaissance. I furnished him the information set out above. He said that he understood and that it was no problem insofar as he was concerned.
PRB:klb (3)
---
164-81-1880 [illegible stamps]
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-1880
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.