SA Charles E. Farrell to SAC Seattle re telephone service at Merwin Dam command post (164-81-3293)

This copy: Part 65 p. 283Also filed at Part 25 p. 202 (primary) · Part 25 p. 203 · Part 74 p. 121

This copy’s own title

SA Charles E. Farrell to SAC Seattle re telephone service at Merwin Dam command post

Document date 19 April 1972

Part 65page 2831 pageDB Cooper-27585

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 25 p. 202.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 65, page 283 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-65:283-283

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-65:283-283

Document: Memo SA Charles E. Farrell to SAC Seattle re telephone service at Merwin Dam command post
Id: Cooper-Part-65:283-283
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-65%3A283-283

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 65 p. 283 (DB Cooper-27585), Memo, dated 19 Apr 1972, serial SE 164-81-3293 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-65%3A283-283

SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 4/19/72

SA CHARLES E. FARRELL

NORJAK

RE: TELEPHONE SERVICE AT COMMAND POST, MERWIN DAM, (TELEPHONE NO. 225-7151)

---

On April 17, 1972, the writer contacted [REDACTED] [REDACTED] of the General Telephone Company, Gresham, Oregon, which handles the telephone service at Merwin Dam to discuss the billing of the telephone installed on 3/20/72 at the Command Post at Merwin Dam. It was explained to [REDACTED] that, in view of the heavy use of the phone to make calls to Fort Lewis, this office was interested in exploring the possibility of having the entire billing made as a Watts installation, retroactive to the date of installation, if such a billing would be cheaper than having the calls treated as long distance calls. To make such a determination, however, the telephone company would have to determine what the bill is at this time. [REDACTED] said he would request a special run of the billing for the above number which would take some three days as these runs are made every three days and would telephonically contact the writer or ASAC BIBLER.

---

[REDACTED] advised, however, even if the Watts line would be cheaper he doubted if it would be made retroactive at this date.

---

It also was explained to [REDACTED] that we might consider furnishing his company with a list of calls made from the Command Post to various numbers at Fort Lewis and have separate billings made up.

---

On April 18, 1972, SA MANNING advised that the Command Post at Merwin Dam would be totally deactivated by early noon of April 18, 1972, and he was then calling the local operator to have the telephone at the Command Post discontinued as of close of business April,18, 1972.

---

CEF:set (4)

164-81-3293 . 8 SEARCHED ......... INDEXED ........ SERIALIZED ... FILED ... APR 1 9 1972 FBI-SEATTLE

---

DB Cooper-27585

Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3293

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.