Interview re subject's Nevada background (heavily redacted)
This copy: Part 66 p. 53Also filed at Part 15 p. 218 (primary) · Part 65 p. 21 · Part 66 p. 250 · Part 67 p. 117 · Part 72 p. 7
This copy’s own title
Interview of redacted subject in Nevada
Dictated 30 November 1971
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 15 p. 218.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-66:053-053
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-66:053-053 Document: FD-302 interview of redacted subject in Nevada Id: Cooper-Part-66:053-053 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-66%3A053-053 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 66 p. 53 (DB Cooper-27771), FD-302 interview, dictated 30 Nov 1971, serial SE 164-81-1086 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-66%3A053-053
FD-302 (Rev. 4-15-64)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Date 12/1/71
---
[REDACTED] advise [REDACTED] Nevada, formerly [REDACTED] Nevada, [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] further advised [REDACTED] had telephone number [REDACTED] Nevada.
---
[guess: Sub. f] 164-81-1086 [guess: mg] [guess: CM] [guess: ECD] [illegible] [illegible]
---
On 11/30/71 at [REDACTED] Nevada File # LV 164-60
by SA THOMAS J. WILLIAMS:kmc Date dictated 11/30/71
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
DB Cooper-27771
Serials: LV 164-60, SE 164-81-1086
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.