ReportBureau

Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Dallas re TWABOM (sub G) fingerprint comparison

This copy: Part 66 p. 150Also filed at Part 33 p. 292 (primary)

This copy’s own title

Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Dallas re TWABOM

Document date 14 January 1974

Part 66page 1501 pageDB Cooper-27944

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 33 p. 292.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 66, page 150 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-66:150-150

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-66:150-150

Document: Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Dallas re TWABOM
Id: Cooper-Part-66:150-150
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-66%3A150-150

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 66 p. 150 (DB Cooper-27944), Report, dated 14 Jan 1974, serial SE 164-81-6077 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-66%3A150-150

People in this document

Clarence M. KelleyOfficial
PagePart 66 p. 150DB Cooper-27944

1-336 (Rev. 7-16-73) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537 REPORT of the IDENTIFICATION DIVISION LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION

---

YOUR FILE NO. January 14, 1974 FBI FILE NO. LATENT CASE NO.

TO: SAC, Dallas

[redacted signature block — partially visible: "S[illegible] 6"]

RE: TWABOM

---

REFERENCE: Airtel 12/11/73 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Dallas SPECIMENS:

Unidentified latent fingerprints in captioned case not identical fingerprints [redacted], [redacted].

Unidentified latent prints in Norjak, Bufile #164-2111, latent case [redacted], Seattle file #164-81 and case entitled "Unsub., aka, [redacted] [redacted], latent case [redacted], Portland file [redacted], compared finger- prints of [redacted], but no identification effected. Palm prints and impressions of the tips, sides and lower joints of the fingers of [redacted] necessary for comparison in Norjak and [redacted] cases.

Laboratory report separate.

---

(2)- Seattle (164-81) 2 - Portland [redacted] 2 - New York [redacted]

164-81-6077

[stamp] SEARCHED......INDEXED...... SERIALIZED......[illegible]...... Clarence M. Kelley, Director 197[4]

THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

DB·Cooper-27944

Serials: 164-2111, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-6077