SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect leads

Document date 13 December 1971

Part 67page 3381 pageDB Cooper-28670

Part of: SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspects and interview of Los Angeles source · 13 December 1971 · Part 54 pp. 428–429

Open in FBI Vault (Part 67, page 338 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-67:338-338

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-67:338-338

Document: Airtel SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect leads
Id: Cooper-Part-67:338-338
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-67%3A338-338

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 67 p. 338 (DB Cooper-28670), Airtel, dated 13 Dec 1971 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-67%3A338-338

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

FBI

Date: 12/13/71

Transmit the following in ________ (Type in plaintext or code)

Via AIRTEL AIR MAIL (Priority)

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497) (P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK

Re Los Angeles teletypes to Seattle, dated 11/26/71 and 12/2/71.

---

RE SUSPECTS [REDACTED]

[REDACTED], California, previously advised that [REDACTED] had once stated [REDACTED] he could hijack a plane. [REDACTED] acquaintance of [REDACTED] about [REDACTED] years ago.

---

On 12/6/71, [REDACTED] was interviewed and an artist's sketch of Unknown Subject was displayed to him. He advised [REDACTED] did not resemble in any way the artist's sketch. It was further ascertained that [REDACTED] was [REDACTED] years of age in [REDACTED] and his current age would be about [REDACTED] years of age.

---

[REDACTED], Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office, previously furnished information that one [REDACTED] was an avid sky diver and type of character to pull a hijack. He stated [REDACTED] is [REDACTED] would be the person who could furnish information concerning [REDACTED]. He added he had not seen [REDACTED] personally for years.

---

On 12/7/71, [REDACTED] was interviewed at her employment, [REDACTED], Los[REDACTED]

---

(2) - Seattle 2 - Los Angeles crs/jal (4)

Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge

Sent _________ M Per _________

---

164-81-[illegible] [stamp: LOS ANGELES DIVISION] [date stamp: partially illegible, appears to read 10 [illegible] 71] DB Cooper-28670

Serials: LA 164-497, SE 164-81