SAC Indianapolis to SAC Seattle enclosing FD-302s and interview notes
Document date 10 August 1979
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-68:085-085
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-68:085-085 Document: Airtel SAC Indianapolis to SAC Seattle enclosing FD-302s and interview notes Id: Cooper-Part-68:085-085 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-68%3A085-085 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 68 p. 85 (DB Cooper-28806), Airtel, dated 10 Aug 1979 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-68%3A085-085
FD-36 (Rev. 7-27-76) FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ Airtel ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ EFTO ☐ CLEAR Date 8/10/79
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, INDIANAPOLIS (164-177) (RUC)
NORJAK (A) Bufile 164-2111
OO: SE
Re SE airtel to IP, dated 4/20/79.
Enclosed for Seattle are the following:
(1) Original and two copies of FD-302's reflecting interviews of [REDACTED] and [REDACTED].
(2) Interview notes of interviews with [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]
Investigation at Indianapolis and [REDACTED], Indiana, concluded. [REDACTED] by observation, comparison to the composite and physical description, does not resemble the subject known as B. D. COOPER.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
SUB J SNF G SUB a (notes)
---
2 - Seattle (Enc. 8) [handwritten: rcd] 1 - Indianapolis [REDACTED] (3)
Approved: [REDACTED] Transmitted ________ (Number) (Time)
DB Cooper-28806
---
SUB J 64-81-[partially illegible] SEARCHED SERIALIZED FILED Per
Serials: 164-2111, IP 164-177, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.