To SAC Seattle re caller's report of encounter at White Center Safeway store

Document date 2 December 1974

Part 68page 2721 pageDB Cooper-29086

Open in FBI Vault (Part 68, page 272 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-68:272-272

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-68:272-272

Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re caller's report of encounter at White Center Safeway store
Id: Cooper-Part-68:272-272
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-68%3A272-272

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 68 p. 272 (DB Cooper-29086), Memo, dated 2 Dec 1974 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-68%3A272-272

SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) 12/2/74

SC [REDACTED] [signature: Sub J]

NORJAK

---

On 11/29/74, [REDACTED], Seattle, Wash., telephone [REDACTED], telephonically called the Seattle FBI Office and advised as follows:

She was at the Safeway store in White Center that afternoon [REDACTED]. An unidentified WF, in her early twenties, [REDACTED]. All of a sudden the unidentified female started laughing at an article regarding this captioned matter and turned [REDACTED] [REDACTED]. She told [REDACTED] that she knows who the UNSUB is, and as a matter of fact, the UNSUB told the unidentified female and her husband prior to the hijacking that he planned to do it, so she wasn't suprised. The unidentified female said that the UNSUB, known to her [REDACTED] (LNU), was at her house about three or four days prior to the time the crime was committed, and at that time he had blonde hair and a beard.

[REDACTED] stated that the unidentified female told her that she [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] described the unidentified female as a WF, [REDACTED], actually [REDACTED], wearing blue jeans, light blouse, [REDACTED]. The only distinguishing feature about this female was the fact [REDACTED]. When she finished her paper, the unidentified female left the store heading north [REDACTED] described by [REDACTED] only as fairly new. She had brought [REDACTED] into the store to leave while doing her business.

[REDACTED] stated that she would call this office again if she sees this female again or finds out her name.

---

[signature: Sub [illegible]] 164-81 6365 [stamp: CORRES__ INDEXED CORRALED FILED DEC 21 FBI - SEATT]

---

(2)

---

DB Cooper-29086

Serials: SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.