SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJACK contact of August 1990
This copy: Part 69 p. 94Also filed at Part 50 p. 77 (primary) · Part 97 p. 284 · Part 107 p. 13
This copy’s own title
SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re River Pines, California caller
Document date 22 August 1990
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 50 p. 77.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-69:094-094
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-69:094-094 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re River Pines, California caller Id: Cooper-Part-69:094-094 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-69%3A094-094 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 69 p. 94 (DB Cooper-29392), Airtel, dated 22 Aug 1990 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-69%3A094-094
FD-36 (Rev. 11-17-88)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 8/22/90
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81)
FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164A-SE-81) (RUC)
─────────────────────────────────────
NORJACK (OO: Seattle)
Enclosed for Seattle are one photograph and two letters provided to Portland Division by [REDACTED]. b6 b7C During March, 1990, [REDACTED], River Pines, California, contacted the Portland Division and advised she had a photograph of an individual she believed looked like the hijacker of captioned case. Portland Division subsequently received a letter postmarked 3/22/90, which enclosed a photograph accompanying this communication.
By registered mail postmarked 8/9/90, [REDACTED] enclosed b6 a two-page letter with a supposed explanation as 'to the identity b7C of the individuals in the photograph. Due to the confused nature of the letter, Seattle Division may wish to place this letter in their NORJACK zero file.
---
(2) - Seattle (Enc. 3) (1) - Portland
(3) - 1* 0 [stamped date] 8/--[illegible]
Approved: __________ Transmitted __________ (Number) (Time)
SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ Per __________ AUG 2 4 1990 FBI - SEA. FILE
DB Cooper-29392 9110
Serials: SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.