SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK (file copy)
This copy: Part 69 p. 115Also filed at Part 45 p. 369 (primary) · Part 62 p. 235
This copy’s own title
SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing FD-302 and agent notes
Document date 9 September 1980
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 45 p. 369.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Part of: SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing FD-302 and agent notes
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-69:115-115
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-69:115-115 Document: Airtel SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing FD-302 and agent notes Id: Cooper-Part-69:115-115 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-69%3A115-115 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 69 p. 115, Airtel, dated 9 Sep 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-69%3A115-115
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 9/9/80
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497)(7)(RUC)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (A) OO: Seattle
Re Los Angeles teletype to the Bureau, 6/11/80.
Enclosed for Seattle are agent interview notes and the original FD-302 setting forth information reported to Los Angeles by [REDACTED] on 6/9/80. Enclosed for Minneapolis is one copy of this FD-302 for assistance in conducting additional leads that might be requested by the office of origin.
As set forth in referenced Los Angeles teletype, [REDACTED] is concerned that any interview of [REDACTED], aka, confronting [REDACTED] with allegations reported by [REDACTED] will immediately identify the source of this information. Accordingly, [REDACTED] has requested her identity be protected.
Los Angeles again suggests that any follow-up interview of [REDACTED] be coordinated through the Los Angeles case agent in this matter who will be able to arrange for her interview in Montana via telephone from Los Angeles.
---
(2) - Seattle (Enc. 2[REDACTED]) 2 - Minneapolis (Enc. 1) 1 - Los Angeles
[REDACTED] (5)
Approved: [REDACTED] Transmitted ________ Per ________ (Number) (Time) ☆ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1980-305-760 5403
Serials: LA 164-497, SE 164-81