Interview at Anderson, Indiana re Eastern Air Lines associate

Interviewed 3 December 1972Transcribed 7 December 1972

Part 72page 1411 pageDB Cooper-30982

Open in FBI Vault (Part 72, page 141 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-72:141-141

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-72:141-141

Document: FD-302 interview at Anderson, Indiana re Eastern Air Lines associate
Id: Cooper-Part-72:141-141
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-72%3A141-141

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 72 p. 141 (DB Cooper-30982), FD-302 interview, interviewed 3 Dec 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-72%3A141-141

FD-302 (REV. 11-27-70)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Date of transcription December 7, 1972

---

[REDACTED], Anderson, Indiana, advised [REDACTED] for Eastern Air Lines. She further stated that he did not have [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] stated [REDACTED] who now lived in Chesterfield, Indiana. [REDACTED]

[REDACTED]

[REDACTED] she further advised only [REDACTED] was approximately To her knowledge only [REDACTED]

When shown the photograph of the artist's conception of the man known as D. B. Cooper, [REDACTED] stated it did not remind her of anyone she knew, and did not look like any of [REDACTED]

---

10 4-81-5078 SEARCHED NDEX SERIALIZED FILED DI 19 FBI - SEATTLE

---

Interviewed on 12/3/72 at Anderson, Indiana File # SE 164- IP 164-62 by [REDACTED] Date dictated 12/8/72

This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.

DB Cooper-30982

---

b6 b7C

Serials: IP 164-62

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.