SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing two FD-302s

Document date 11 January 1974

Part 72page 1541 pageDB Cooper-31005

Open in FBI Vault (Part 72, page 154 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-72:154-154

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-72:154-154

Document: Airtel SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing two FD-302s
Id: Cooper-Part-72:154-154
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-72%3A154-154

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 72 p. 154 (DB Cooper-31005), Airtel, dated 11 Jan 1974 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-72%3A154-154

1/11/74

AIRTEL AIR MAIL

[REDACTED - b6, b7C]

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, SAN FRANCISCO (164-220)(P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: Seattle

Re: [REDACTED - b6, b7C]

Enclosed herewith for the Seattle Division are two FD 302s, two copies each, reflecting interviews of [REDACTED - b6, b7C, b7D] at Pleasant Hill, California, on 1/2 and 1/10/74, respectively.

It would appear that [REDACTED] from information furnished by [REDACTED] whose identity should be protected, should be considered a logical suspect. Office of origin should note, however, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and therefore is unable to provide any pertinent information as to suspect's activities and/or financial status in recent years.

Consideration should be given to obtaining recent driver's license photo of suspect and interview [REDACTED - b6, b7C] [REDACTED] who is believed to be close associate of person knowledgeable regarding suspect.

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

(2) Seattle (Encl 4) 2 - San Francisco [REDACTED] (4) C3

---

Sub q 1/4-8/-6/23 SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED [REDACTED] JAN 14 1974 FBI - SEATTLE

---

DB Cooper-31005

Serials: SE 164-81, SF 164-220

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.