Re telephonic contact following FBI interview in NORJAK case
This copy: Part 72 p. 195Also filed at Part 38 p. 100 (primary)
This copy’s own title
Re telephonic follow-up after further study of Cooper photograph
Interviewed 16 August 1976Dictated 17 August 1976Transcribed 17 August 1976
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 38 p. 100.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-72:195-195
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-72:195-195 Document: FD-302 re telephonic follow-up after further study of Cooper photograph Id: Cooper-Part-72:195-195 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-72%3A195-195 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 72 p. 195 (DB Cooper-31067), FD-302 interview, interviewed 16 Aug 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-72%3A195-195
FD-302 (Rev. 11-27-70)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Date of transcription 8/17/76
---
[REDACTED], telephone number [REDACTED] [REDACTED], telephonically contacted SA [REDACTED], and advised that after interviewing Agents had departed after interview of [REDACTED] studied the photo- graph of D. B. COOPER more, he made a statement to the effect, I didn't want to tell the interviewing Agents this but, referring to the composite and comparing the composite with [REDACTED] he said [REDACTED]
---
Interviewed on 8/16/76 at Livermore, California File # SF 164-220 [handwritten annotation] 164-81-[REDACTED] by SA [REDACTED] Date dictated 8/17/76
---
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. DB Cooper-31067 GPO: 1975 O - 586-118
---
b6 b7C
Serials: SF 164-220
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.