FBI Laboratory report to SAC Los Angeles re anonymous letter claiming D.B. Cooper is dead
This copy: Part 73 p. 279Also filed at Part 28 p. 171 (primary) · Part 66 p. 169
This copy’s own title
FBI Laboratory report and transmittal to SAC Los Angeles re NORJAK specimens Q50-Q51
Document date 4 October 1972
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 28 p. 171.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Part of: FBI Laboratory report to SAC Los Angeles on specimens Q49-Q51, with administrative page
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-73:279-279
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-73:279-279 Document: FBI Laboratory report and transmittal to SAC Los Angeles re NORJAK specimens Q50-Q51 Id: Cooper-Part-73:279-279 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-73%3A279-279 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 73 p. 279 (DB Cooper-31632), Report, dated 4 Oct 1972, serial SE 164-81-3977 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-73%3A279-279
7-1b REPORT of the FBI LABORATORY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535
To: SAC, Los Angeles (164-497) Date: October 4, 1972 FBI File No. 164-2111 Re: NORJAK Lab. No. D-720928050 LL
---
Sub Re- Sub G Sub K
---
Specimens received 9/28/72
Q49 Envelope bearing hand printed address "Los Angeles Times Times-Mirror Square Los Angeles, Calif."
Q50 Accompanying two-page hand printed letter, first page beginning "Dear Sirs, [REDACTED] is Dead. "D. B. Cooper"..." b6 b7C Q51 Second page beginning "Everything I've said here is..." and signed [REDACTED]
Result of examination:
It was not determined whether the questioned writing on Q49 through Q51 was prepared by any of the persons involved in the preparation of the questioned material previously received in this matter. A conclusion could not be reached in this regard because of a lack of comparable writing and distortion in portions of the questioned material previously received; however, nothing of particular significance was noted in the limited comparison which could be conducted.
Q49 through Q51 were not identified in the Anonymous Letter File. Copies of these specimens have been added to this file for future reference.
No watermarks, indented writing, or other features were found on Q49 through Q51 which would be of value in determining the source of these specimens.
The submitted evidence was photographed and will be returned separately.
---
Sub R 16 4-81-3977
---
DB Cooper-31632
Serials: 164-2111, LA 164-497, SE 164-81-3977