To SAC Seattle re Washougal informants claiming unique location technique

This copy: Part 74 p. 118Also filed at Part 65 p. 259 (primary)

This copy’s own title

To SAC Seattle re Vancouver/Washougal tip locating claimed Cooper landing point

Document date 7 August 1972

Part 74page 1181 pageDB Cooper-31989

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 65 p. 259.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 74, page 118 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-74:118-118

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-74:118-118

Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re Vancouver/Washougal tip locating claimed Cooper landing point
Id: Cooper-Part-74:118-118
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-74%3A118-118

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 74 p. 118 (DB Cooper-31989), Memo, dated 7 Aug 1972, serial SE 164-81-3963 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-74%3A118-118

8-7-72 Subs 8 [guess: crop.] Subs S [guess: without may] [illegible] without m[illegible]

---

SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P)

SA [REDACTED]

NORJAK [REDACTED]

---

On July 31, 1972, [REDACTED], Vancouver, Washington, advised he was recently contacted by [REDACTED], Wash- ougal, Washington, who is [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised [REDACTED] has developed a method, known only to [REDACTED] [REDACTED], using his time honored technique.

---

[REDACTED] advised that sometime prior to July 30, 1972, he advised [REDACTED] that the captioned UNSUB exited the instant aircraft somewhere in northern Clark County or southern Cowlitz County, Washington, and on July 30, 1972, [REDACTED] took [REDACTED] to a location approximately two miles northwest of Point A of the original search area, and exhibited his technique, convincing [REDACTED] that [REDACTED] had found the approximate location [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised no attempt was made to actually locate [REDACTED], pending notification of the Bureau.

---

On July 31, 1972, [REDACTED] revealed this location to SA [REDACTED] at which time the location was pinpointed on an aerial photograph of Section 10, Township 5, North Range 1 East, SW-67 FLT27-38 6-18-68 Scale 1 inch equals 400 feet. The point was located by triangulation from County Road 16, producing a prime search area (double hatch marks) and a secondary search area (single hatch marks) on the photograph.

---

[REDACTED] added that neither he nor [REDACTED] want their identity revealed regarding this matter, in that if the in- stant money is actually located using [REDACTED] procedure, undue suspicions might be raised regarding their ability to perform uncommon feats bordering on 'witchcraft'.

---

(2) Seattle (Enc. 1) RDS/bjb (2)

---

SEARCHED...........INDEXED........ SERIALIZED.....&...FILED....[illegible] AUG 6 1972 FBI — SEATTLE

---

1 64-81- 3963

---

DB Cooper-31989

---

b6 b7C b7D b7E b6 b7C b7D b6 b7C b7D b6 b7C b7D

Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3963

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.